Conclusions
Like any solution with four CPU cores, the Core 2 Extreme QX6700's effectiveness depends on what you feed it. Give it a nicely parallelizable task with four or more threads, and it will utterly embarrass former top dogs like the Core 2 Extreme X6800 and the Athlon 64 FX-62. For applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, image processing, and scientific computing, the QX6700 trumps all other desktop processors—and, I suspect, a great many dual-socket Opteron workstations. 3DMark06's multithreaded CPU test gives us a glimpse of how multithreaded gaming might look, and the QX6700 performs very well there, too.

Feed it a simple app with only one or two threads, though, and this quad-core monster begins to look an awful lot like a Core 2 Duo E6700 with higher power consumption and a much steeper price tag. Of course, even that isn't a horrible place to be. In single- and dual-threaded applications, the QX6700 still wallops the Athlon 64 FX-62 nearly across the board, with similar power requirements and heat output. That fact simply underscores how good the Core 2 lineup truly is.

Still, this is very much an Extreme processor in every sense. As I've said in various ways over the years, I happen to think forking over a grand for a CPU is sheer insanity. If you do write that check, though, be prepared to write another one for a good water cooling system. Most air coolers that could keep this thing cool would simply be too loud for my taste, and you won't want to attempt much overclocking with air cooling.

This quad-core CPU puts Intel in the same tricky position that the GPU guys have had to endure from time to time: the hardware is now well ahead of software development, particularly in mainstream consumer applications and games. Many owners of this beast may be stuck waiting for new applications to arrive that use it to its fullest ability. Like I said, though, I'm confident the applications will come, and when they do, the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 may well be the best option for running them.

Soon, the QX6700 should get some competition in the form of AMD's so-called 4x4 platform. Can AMD unseat the QX6700 using dual-socket motherboards? Interesting question. I have my doubts, but I suppose we'll soon find out. 

Related articles

  • Live blog from Justin Rattner's R&D keynote at IDF
    August 21, 2008

    Peek in on us as we peek in on Intel's research and development horizons—live from IDF San Francisco. Read more...

    10 comments
    Last post by bfellow at 3:34 PM on August 25, 2008

  • Live blog from the Gelsinger-Perlmutter IDF keynote
    August 19, 2008

    We're coming to you live from the Pat Gelsinger-Dadi Perlmutter keynote, where we're expecting to learn more about Nehalem and upcoming Intel tech. Listen in as we commit typos in real time. Read more...

    25 comments
    Last post by Meadows at 7:15 AM on August 22, 2008

  • Live blog from Craig Barrett's IDF keynote
    August 19, 2008

    Read along as we type live from Craig Barrett's IDF keynote. Read more...

    9 comments
    Last post by HurgyMcGurgyGurg at 4:35 AM on August 20, 2008

  • Via's Nano L2100 takes on Intel's Atom 230
    July 30, 2008

    They're small, low-power, and cheap. The Atom from Intel and Nano from Via are both all-new CPU architectures, and they both push the frontiers of low-cost computing and mobility. How do they match up? Here's our first look. Read more...

    47 comments
    Last post by swaaye at 5:05 PM on August 20, 2008

  • Today's processors: the value angle
    May 27, 2008

    Join us for take two of our look at processor value—this time with tri- and quad-core Phenoms, 45nm Core 2 Quads, and more. Read more...

    99 comments
    Last post by TurtlePerson2 at 4:50 PM on September 22, 2008

  • AMD's Phenom X3 processors
    April 23, 2008

    Good things often come in powers of two, especially in computers. Two, four, eight, or sixteen copies of a common resource—rendering pipelines, megabytes of memory, processors—are instantly recognizable quantities that will most assuredly lead to additional goodness. But three? Not so much. That's about to change, though. Read more...

    60 comments
    Last post by greeny at 4:11 PM on August 19, 2008

  • Intel's Core 2 Quad Q9300 processor
    April 17, 2008

    The Core 2 Quad Q9300 is Intel's most affordable quad-core processor, and it promises to supplant a long-time favorite of ours, the Core 2 Quad Q6600, by offering additional goodness at the exact same price. Here's how it fares. Read more...

    60 comments
    Last post by LoneWolf15 at 2:48 PM on April 23, 2008

  • Overclocking Intel's Xeon X3320 processor
    April 16, 2008

    The Xeon X3320 shares the same 45nm Penryn core as the Core 2 Quad Q9300, but with a lower operating voltage that hints at greater overclocking potential. Join us as we crank the clocks to see just how fast an X3320 will run on a standard desktop mobo. Read more...

    36 comments
    Last post by ludi at 2:29 PM on April 22, 2008

Latest news stories

Related articles

Copyright ©1999-2008 The Tech Report. All rights reserved.
About us | Privacy policy | Subscribe to our mailing list