Conclusions
I wasn't quite sure what to expect from overclocking the Xeon X3320. Server and workstation processors have proven to be potent overclockers in the past, but quad-core chips present a greater challenge. System stability can suffer even if only one of those cores isn't comfortable at a given speed. AMD's Phenom processors can set independent clocks for each core, but that's not possible with Intel's Core 2 processors or the Xeon X3320.

Our off-the-shelf X3320 was perfectly stable up to 3.26GHz with its stock voltage and a large—but relatively inexpensive—Scythe Ninja cooler. Some of the chip's cores were clearly capable of running at higher speeds, but as a whole, 3.26GHz was all she wrote. This 30% jump in clock speed isn't the most impressive overclock we've seen, but it's a decent margin for a quad-core chip. The fact that our X3320 didn't require any extra voltage to hit 3.26GHz suggests there's plenty of headroom to be exploited in the Penryn core, as well.

Even though we didn't hit jaw-dropping clock speeds, this is exactly the kind of overclock I love to see as an enthusiast. Exotic water and phase-change coolers are marvels to behold, but I'm more interested in the "free" overclocking headroom that can be exploited with modest air cooling. And since plenty of affordable P35-based motherboards have no problem running at front-side bus speeds beyond 400MHz, you don't need a fancy motherboard to push the Xeon X3320, either.

Whether the Xeon X3320 has more overclocking potential than its Core 2 Quad Q9300 desktop counterpart remains to be seen. If our experience is any indication, though, you should have no problem cranking the X3320 up to 3GHz and beyond.TR

Related articles

  • Intel's Core i7 processors
    November 3, 2008

    Core i7 processors have secretly been shattering records in Damage Labs for the past few weeks. Now we can tell all. Read on for the low-down on Intel's new system architecture and CPU. Read more...

    212 comments
    Last post by indeego at 7:32 PM on November 19, 2008

  • Live blog from Justin Rattner's R&D keynote at IDF
    August 21, 2008

    Peek in on us as we peek in on Intel's research and development horizons—live from IDF San Francisco. Read more...

    10 comments
    Last post by bfellow at 3:34 PM on August 25, 2008

  • Live blog from the Gelsinger-Perlmutter IDF keynote
    August 19, 2008

    We're coming to you live from the Pat Gelsinger-Dadi Perlmutter keynote, where we're expecting to learn more about Nehalem and upcoming Intel tech. Listen in as we commit typos in real time. Read more...

    25 comments
    Last post by Meadows at 7:15 AM on August 22, 2008

  • Live blog from Craig Barrett's IDF keynote
    August 19, 2008

    Read along as we type live from Craig Barrett's IDF keynote. Read more...

    9 comments
    Last post by HurgyMcGurgyGurg at 4:35 AM on August 20, 2008

  • Via's Nano L2100 takes on Intel's Atom 230
    July 30, 2008

    They're small, low-power, and cheap. The Atom from Intel and Nano from Via are both all-new CPU architectures, and they both push the frontiers of low-cost computing and mobility. How do they match up? Here's our first look. Read more...

    47 comments
    Last post by swaaye at 5:05 PM on August 20, 2008

  • Today's processors: the value angle
    May 27, 2008

    Join us for take two of our look at processor value—this time with tri- and quad-core Phenoms, 45nm Core 2 Quads, and more. Read more...

    99 comments
    Last post by TurtlePerson2 at 4:50 PM on September 22, 2008

  • AMD's Phenom X3 processors
    April 23, 2008

    Good things often come in powers of two, especially in computers. Two, four, eight, or sixteen copies of a common resource—rendering pipelines, megabytes of memory, processors—are instantly recognizable quantities that will most assuredly lead to additional goodness. But three? Not so much. That's about to change, though. Read more...

    60 comments
    Last post by greeny at 4:11 PM on August 19, 2008

  • Intel's Core 2 Quad Q9300 processor
    April 17, 2008

    The Core 2 Quad Q9300 is Intel's most affordable quad-core processor, and it promises to supplant a long-time favorite of ours, the Core 2 Quad Q6600, by offering additional goodness at the exact same price. Here's how it fares. Read more...

    60 comments
    Last post by LoneWolf15 at 2:48 PM on April 23, 2008

Latest news stories

Related articles

Copyright ©1999-2008 The Tech Report. All rights reserved.
About us | Privacy policy | Subscribe to our mailing list