Conclusions
It's been a long time since a Radeon was the graphics card of choice at the all-important $199 price point, but the HD 4850 looks like it might have the title locked up. The current GeForce 9800 GTX is simply no match for AMD's latest mid-range offering, and Nvidia's surprise, the GeForce 9800 GTX+, has quite a bit of ground to make up if it hopes to be competitive. We'll have a full work-up of the GTX+ soon, of course, but the cards only just arrived this morning.
While it would be hasty to draw too many conclusions before we have a better grasp of the GeForce 9800 GTX+'s performance, and before AMD fully reveals its Radeon HD 4000 series, one thing is certain: the graphics war looks more competitive now than it's been in a very long time. That's ultimately a good thing for consumers, especially since AMD looks keen to take the fight aggressively to mid-range products that most consumers can afford.

274 comments — Last by AbRASiON at 4:46 AM on 06/30/08
| A closer look at the new AMDRory Read and his cohorts chart a new course | 66 | |
| AMD's Radeon HD 7950 graphics processorJust a smidge less | 146 | |
| PC gaming in 3D stereo: 3D Vision 2 vs. HD3DWe slip on the funny glasses to assess the state of stereoscopic gaming | 60 | |
| AMD's Radeon HD 7970 graphics processorWe've spent the holidays on the Southern Islands | 461 | |
| Nvidia's GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 graphics cardThe GF110 takes an arrow in the knee | 106 | |
| Today's mid-range GPUs in SkyrimFor the optimal dragon-slaying experience | 119 | |
| Today's mid-range GPUs in Battlefield 3Six GeForces and Radeons take point | 70 | |
| Battle of the Radeon HD 6950sCards from Gigabyte, MSI, and XFX go head to head | 42 |
| Friday night topic: The trouble with Best Buy | 148 |