Conclusions
The GeForce GTX 285 spent much of its time in our tests being hounded by less expensive multi-GPU solutions, including the GeForce 9800 GX2 and especially the Radeon HD 4850 X2, which has enough memory to really present a challenge. Still, the GTX 285 is the fastest single-GPU video card on the planet, and that counts for a fair bit. When multi-GPU solutions stumble, as they sometimes inescapably do, the GTX 285 should still perform as expected. Impressively, the GTX 285 has the lowest power draw at idle of any card in the field, and its acoustics and power consumption under load are both quite acceptable for this class of graphics card. The GTX 285's status as the fastest single GPU card makes it an ideal building block for a fast SLI setup, toothe dual GTX 285 config outstripped everything else we tested.
The GTX 285's $379 price tag makes it undeniably a luxury-priced item in a time when most games simply don't require the fastest possible video card. The fact that you can buy a Radeon HD 4870 1GB or a GeForce GTX 260 for substantially less moneywell over a hundred bucksmay be rather off-putting since the performance delta simply isn't that huge, especially in terms of real-world playability. But the GTX 285 has essentially captured the single-GPU performance crown, and I suppose there is a price premium to be attached to that.
Speaking of performance crowns, if there's a dual-slot, dual-GPU, single-card performance crown, then the GeForce GTX 295 has snagged that one. The GTX 295 is an even more extreme solution than the 285, obviously, but it's the class of the exotics. You really shouldn't even consider buying one of these right now unless you plan on forking out for a 30" monitor, as well. But if you're going to go all out, the GTX 295 isn't a bad way to go. Its noise levels are a little high compared to that freakish triple-slot Palit 4870 X2, but no worse under load than a pair of GTX 285s.
As for the Radeons, AMD appears to have given its partners more freedom than ever before to come up with their own custom board and cooling designsenough rope, in fact, to hang themselves. Asus seems to have obliged. The custom coolers on both its 4850 and 4870 cards have severe thermal problems with an adjacent card installed, as we've chronicled.
Sapphire has produced more mixed results with its 4850 X2. On one hand, the card is too long and too loud to appeal to most people. I really can't recommend it as it is. On the other hand, the card's basic hardware formula is dynamite. The price-performance mix makes a lot of practical sense, as witnessed by the fact that this $299 card was such a menace to the GeForce GTX 285. Sapphire told us at CES that it plans on re-launching the 4850 X2 with some fixes in place soon. If they can lower its noise levels, that would be nice. If they can also reduce the length of the card, then we'd really be talking. We've heard rumors than AMD might decide to introduce its own 4850 X2 to combat the GeForce GTX 285. Sounds like a plan to me.
The best custom design we saw from a Radeon board vendor is Palit's Revolution 700. This thing's cooler is huge, but it's also effective and fairly quiet. We'll have to see how Palit prices this card when it arrives on U.S. shores in volume, but this is one bit of freelancing we can appreciate on its merits.

-
117 comments —
Last by jonybiskit at 2:50 AM on 02/08/09 - Email the author(s): Scott Wasson
- Sign up to receive notices when we publish new articles
- Or go back to TR's front page
-
AMD outlines its Gamers Manifesto
AMD has released a Gamers Manifesto that details how the company works with developers to benefit all gamers, not just those with Radeon graphics cards. Join us as we take a closer look at the manifesto's guiding principles and how they apply to DirectX 11, Eyefinity, and GPU-accelerated physics. Read more...
97 comments —
Last by grantmeaname at 12:30 PM on 03/20/10 -
AMD's Radeon HD 5830 graphics card
The newest Radeon is here to step into the massive vacuum between about $169 and $399. But is the 5830 up to its role? And how does it compare to mid-range graphics cards of old? We've taken a quick look. Read more...
167 comments —
Last by mutarasector at 10:23 PM on 03/15/10 -
Nvidia brings Optimus switchable graphics to notebooks
Switchable graphics is the best way to squeeze decent gaming performance and great battery life from the same notebook, but it's never been able to deliver graphics power on demand seamlessly. Nvidia's Optimus switchable tech promises to do better, and we've tested a system to find out whether it... Read more...
54 comments —
Last by Bensam123 at 5:16 PM on 02/15/10 -
GF100 graphics architecture unveiled
Nvidia has decided to tell all about its upcoming GF100 graphics chip. Join us as we consider what makes this GPU's architecture distinctive and handicap its performance prospects. Read more...
147 comments —
Last by thomasxstewart at 7:53 PM on 02/20/10 -
AMD's Radeon HD 5670 graphics card
Today, AMD has taken DirectX 11 graphics to $99, thanks to a bite-sized version of the silicon from its high-end Radeon HD 5000-series cards. But does the new Radeon HD 5670 offer the same mix of performance and power-efficiency as its big brothers? Read more...
161 comments —
Last by MadManOriginal at 6:45 AM on 01/20/10 -
GPU acceleration comes to Flash video
At long last, playback of Flash videos on YouTube, Hulu, and elsewhere can be GPU-accelerated. Join us as we take three different low-power systems for a spin to see how they handle the Flash 10.1 beta. Read more...
64 comments —
Last by sigher at 1:56 AM on 01/01/10 -
Inside Fermi's graphics architecture
Nvidia has already revealed much about the compute-focused features of its upcoming Fermi GPU architecture. Now, insider info and careful speculation take us deep into the graphics capabilities of Nvidia's next GPU. Read more...
98 comments —
Last by moritzgedig at 4:20 AM on 01/07/10 -
AMD's Radeon HD 5970 graphics card
CrossFire on a stick goes to the next level in the Radeon HD 5970, the new fastest graphics card on the planet. This one is extreme in more ways than one, though. Read on to see what we mean. Read more...
177 comments —
Last by Damage at 3:57 PM on 11/24/09
