What to watch for in the test results
Now that we've introduced you to T-bred, it's time to get down to business and see how this beast performs. Thing is, we already know this chip isn't wildy different from its predecessor, so the only real difference we'd expect to see here come from the 66MHz clock speed increase between the Athlon XP 2100+ and 2200+—from 1.73GHz to 1.8GHz.

Don't expect a light show or anything.

Meanwhile, we'll be comparing it to Pentium 4 chips with both 400 and 533MHz front-side bus speeds, which is a little more intriguing. We know the Athlon XP seriously outperforms the Pentium 4 on a clock-for-clock basis, but the higher bus speeds improve the Pentium 4's ability to execute instructions on a per-clock basis. The Pentium 4 is faster at 2.4GHz on a 533MHz bus than at 2.4GHz on a 400MHz bus, especially when paired with fast memory. We'll be interested to see how the Athlon XP matches up against the Pentium 4 now that the P4 is faster at a given speed.

Beyond that, the real question most folks are probably asking about T-bred is: How does it overclock? Does the die shrink bring immedate benefits to those of us willing to run things out of spec a little? We'll delve into that question, as well.


T-bred (left) and its bitter rival, the Pentium 4 (right)

Our testing methods
As ever, we did our best to deliver clean benchmark numbers. Tests were run at least twice, and the results were averaged.

Our test systems were configured like so:

 Athlon XPPentium 4 845Pentium 4 850Pentium 4 850E
Processor AMD Athlon XP 2100+ 1.73GHz
AMD Athlon XP 2200+ 1.8GHz
Intel Pentium 4 2.4GHz Intel Pentium 4 2.4GHz Intel Pentium 4 2.4GHz
Intel Pentium 4 2.53GHz
Front-side bus266MHz (133MHz double-pumped)400MHz (100MHz quad-pumped)400MHz (100MHz quad-pumped)533MHz (133MHz quad-pumped)
MotherboardShuttle AK35GT2/RAbit BD7-RAIDIntel D850MDIntel D850EMV2
ChipsetVIA KT333Intel 845Intel 850Intel 850E
North bridgeVT836782845 MCH82850 MCH82850E MCH
South bridgeVT8233A82801BA ICH282801BA ICH282801BA ICH2
Chipset driversVIA 4-in-1
4.38(2)v(a)
Intel Application Accelerator 6.22Intel Application Accelerator 6.22Intel Application Accelerator 6.22
Memory size512MB (2 DIMMs)512MB (2 DIMMs)512MB (4 RIMMs)512MB (4 RIMMs)
Memory typeCorsair XMS3000 PC2700 DDR SDRAMCorsair XMS2400 PC2100 DDR SDRAMSamsung PC800 Rambus DRAMSamsung PC800 Rambus DRAM
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600 128MB (Detonator XP 28.32 video drivers)
SoundCreative SoundBlaster Live!
StorageMaxtor DiamondMax Plus D740X 7200RPM ATA/100 hard drive
OSMicrosoft Windows XP Professional
OS updatesNone

I want to give a big thanks to Corsair for providing us with DDR333 memory for our testing. Their XMS3000 DIMMs allowed us to run the memory on our Shuttle AK35GT2/R test motherboard at CAS2 timings at 166MHz (that's 333MHz DDR, kids). Good RAM didn't hurt in our overclocking attempts, either. If you're looking to tweak out your system to the max and maybe overclock it a little, Corsair's RAM is definitely worth considering. Using it makes life easier for us as we're dealing with brand-new chipsets and pre-production motherboards, because we don't have to worry so much about stability and compatibility. The stuff flat works.

The test systems' Windows desktops were set at 1024x768 in 32-bit color at an 85Hz screen refresh rate. Vertical refresh sync (vsync) was disabled for all tests.

We used the following versions of our test applications:

All the tests and methods we employed are publicly available and reproducible. If you have questions about our methods, hit our forums to talk with us about them.

Copyright ©1999-2009 The Tech Report. All rights reserved.
About us | Privacy policy | Subscribe to our mailing list