Conclusions
Thanks to its on-chip memory controller and its ability to use unbuffered DIMMs, the 3400+ has the lowest memory access latencies we've ever seen. The benchmarks put the Athlon 64 3400+ just behind the Athlon 64 FX-51 in terms of overall performance, and I suppose AMD's "3400+" model number is warranted, at least for gamers, for whatever that's worth. As has often been the case, which chip is fastest depends quite a bit on what you want to do. The Athlon 64 3400+ pummels the Pentium 4 3.2GHz in most of our gaming benchmarks, although the P4 stills does relatively well in our media encoding, speech recognition, and SSE2-laden 3D rendering tests. Athlon 64 processors are strong across the board, though, with few real performance weaknesses.

The most interesting questions about the A64 3400+, however, aren't strictly about its performance. Many enthusiasts will have a hard time forking over the cash to build a system based on AMD's 754-pin socket. Socket 754 only allows for a single-channel memory configuration, and AMD has already made clear its intention to move all Athlon 64 products to a new 939-pin socket later this year. If you're hoping to to upgrade your processor to a higher speed grade down the road, Socket 754 isn't a very good bet. Then again, as fast as things move in motherboards, chipsets, and memory these days, many of us have just resigned ourselves to performing a motherboard upgrade along with each processor upgrade.

AMD has priced the 3400+ at $417, exactly at price parity, at least for now, with the Pentium 4 3.2GHz. The Athlon 64 FX-51 will remain at $733, making it an almost irrational purchase decision. The 3400+ is nearly as fast as the FX-51 in most applications, if not faster. The FX-51's need for regisitered memory makes for two strikes against it: higher costs and higher latencies. Strike three, perhaps, is the need to purchase DIMMs in pairs because of the dual-channel config. Overall, the 3400+ is much more economical than the FX-51.

In fact, the 3400+ is the product that should finally push the Athlon 64 into the mainstream market. With its introduction, the Athlon 64 3200+ drops to $278, and the 3000+ slots in at a very affordable $218. Those prices mirror Intel's prices for the Pentium 4 3.0GHz and 2.8GHz chips exactly. With these price cuts, the Athlon 64 has arrived in earnest. Now, if only we had a 64-bit version of Windows to run on it... 

Related articles

  • Intel's Core Mobile CPUs debut in Asus' K42F notebook
    January 4, 2010

    Arrandale is Intel's first mainstream notebook CPU based on the Nehalem microarchitecture, and it shares the same potent silicon as the new Clarksfield desktop CPUs. We have the goods on the new Core Mobile lineup and a look at Asus' first Arrandale-based notebook, the affordable K42F. Read more...

    32 comments
    Last by MadManOriginal at 3:43 PM on 01/17/10

  • Intel's Core i3 and i5 dual-core processors
    January 4, 2010

    Intel's Nehalem microarchitecture has gone entirely mainstream with the arrival of the dual-core processors code-named Clarkdale. This release also marks two major milestones: the first 32-nm processor, and the first major desktop CPU with integrated graphics. But is it a peanut butter and Vegemite sandwich? Hmm. Read more...

    148 comments
    Last by Meadows at 3:21 AM on 01/10/10

  • Intel's next-gen Atom arrives in Asus' Eee PC 1005PE netbook
    December 20, 2009

    Intel didn't intend for its Atom CPU to revolutionize the ultraportable notebook market, but it happened anyway. Today, the next-gen "Pine Trail" Atom platform debuts in Asus' Eee PC 1005PE. We take a close look at Atom's second coming to see what's new. Read more...

    122 comments
    Last by MadManOriginal at 2:13 PM on 01/04/10

  • Phenom II X4 965 slips into more modest thermal envelope
    November 3, 2009

    Some folks scoffed when AMD introduce the Phenom II X4 965 processor back in August with a 140W thermal design power. Now, some months later, AMD has introduced a revised version with a 125W TDP. Read more...

    70 comments
    Last by Kaleid at 1:36 PM on 11/15/09

  • Intel's Core i7 comes to notebooks
    October 6, 2009

    Nehalem has finally arrived for notebooks in the form of Clarksdale Core i7 mobile processors that are virtually identical to their Lynnfield desktop counterparts. Keep reading to see how the new Core i7-920XM performs inside a cutting-edge portable gaming rig. Read more...

    57 comments
    Last by MadManOriginal at 1:59 PM on 10/11/09

  • Intel's Core i5-750 and Core i7-870 processors
    September 8, 2009

    These new Core i5 and i7 processors promise to enable systems that are faster, cheaper, quieter, smaller, and more energy efficient than prior desktop PCs. Has Intel pulled it off? Keep reading to find out. Read more...

    341 comments
    Last by Trymor at 12:04 PM on 09/25/09

  • AMD's Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor
    August 13, 2009

    The Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor could compute Pi to an insane number of digits during the time it takes to pronounce its full name, in part because it runs at a rather high-strung clock rate of 3.4GHz. But mostly because of the name. Read more...

    105 comments
    Last by ish718 at 12:58 AM on 08/20/09

  • A bevy of new desktop processors arrives
    June 9, 2009

    AMD and Intel have deluged us with new CPUs. The result? An enormous roundup of 26 different types of processors, including five brand-new ones. We've poked, prodded, tested for performance, measured power efficiency, overclocked, and considered the value propositions for CPUs from $87 to $999. Read more...

    136 comments
    Last by blubje at 3:01 PM on 08/01/09

Loading ...

Copyright ©1999-2010 The Tech Report. All rights reserved.
About us | Privacy policy | Subscribe to our mailing list