Seriously. I still have to use a third-party, system-level-altering application to restore OS 9 window shade functionality to OS X (oddly enough, it's called WindowShade) because Apple is way too busy doing important things like building Steve Jobs an Al Gore-powered Suit of Immortality and, apparently, engineering things nobody really, truly needs.
Like the new iPod shuffle.
By now you've undoubtedly read the reviews, skimmed the specs and done other things of an alliterative nature. Some of you may have ventured into an Apple store and beheld the thing for yourself, perhaps coddling it gently in your palm like a newborn chick. Or biting it like a silver dollar to see if it's really real. I don't know—you're an odd bunch.
For those of you who ignored the hype and kept wondering why pictures of anodized suppositories kept littering your screen, I'll regurgitate the basics here:
Of course, it's the last bullet that has most people irked. I realize Apple is on some sort of button jihad, but this is, how do you say, dumb. This product firmly falls into the "just because you could, doesn't mean you should" camp. Let's examine this a little more flippantly, shall we?
Was anyone complaining about the gargantuan, 3/4-scale matchbook size of the previous shuffle? No.
Was anyone frightened and/or confused by the previous shuffle's controls that mimicked those of nearly every iPod that had gone before? Maybe, but that's more of a psychiatric issue.
Was anyone so distressed by being able to use any pair of headphones they liked that they went fetal at the thought of having to make a decision? See above.
Because that's the real kicker. With controls on the headphone cord, you have to use Apple's headphones. Or wait for companies to release their own, Apple-approved compatible headphones. Or wait for an adapter to use their existing headphones. Or just weep gently until a stranger takes pity upon them and pushes them in front of a bus.
So yeah, now you've got a proprietary controller for the shuffle. And while Apple and proprietary devices/standards/turtlenecks are nothing new, this one seems especially myopic.
But at least it's user friendly in the way only Apple can make it user friendly. Not.
Here's the diagram Apple itself posted to explain how to use the controller.
Ooh, the eleganceness.
I'll admit, I could become a pro at using this thing in about five minutes. But I'm a gadget nerd. Also, I wouldn't be trying to learn it while running on a treadmill or sweatin' to the oldies. Regardless of the learning curve, it's still a step back when the previous shuffle's controls had no curve to begin with.
Perhaps I should be happy that it gave me something to rant about this week. But I'd rather be relaying something cool and interesting than cold and annoying. And no, I won't be trumpeting the late-by-two-year addition of cut-and-paste to the iPhone OS next week. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to learn how to multiclick like an amaXhosa.
|Porsche and AOC present the PDS241 and PDS271 monitors||8|
|EK shows its first waterblock for an AMD Ryzen mobo||3|
|HyperX's Pulsefire gaming mouse reviewed||5|
|HP DreamColor Z31x and Z24x displays are ready for the movies||7|
|Intel's 32GB Optane Memory storage accelerator reviewed||61|
|Akitio Node Lite is a small aluminum home for PCIe devices||10|
|Radeon Pro Duo gets more energy-efficient with Polaris||43|
|Rumor: Intel Skylake-X and X299 will headline Computex 2017||56|
|Rumor: Nvidia to answer Radeon RX 550 with GeForce GT 1030||20|
|Love the packaging. For the love of god - this minimalism and colour scheme on regular people cards, please.||+33|