Part of the reason we've avoided doing so is that, let's face it, it has the potential to be kind of cheesy. There's much more to a CPU's value proposition than a cold cost-benefit analysis can capture, and in truth, doing such an analysis well can prove rather tricky. That's why you should read our CPU reviews and our system building guides to see what they recommend.
A vocal contingent of our readers has long been asking for a closer look at price-performance issues, and we think we've cooked up some novel ways of expressing that data that may make it feasible. So we've decided to give it a shot.
Fortuitously, AMD and Intel both took an axe to their prices last month, and we recently added Intel's $113 Core 2 Duo E4300 to our constellation of test results, so now seems like a particularly appropriate time to consider performance per dollar. Join us as we look at the value proposition of 16 CPUs, from the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ all the way up to the Core 2 Extreme QX6800, across a wide range of games, applications, and even energy efficiency tests. Some of what we found surprised us, and it may change the way you think about CPU value.
|Acer's G-Sync-infused 4K monitor priced at $800||41|
|Early deal of the week: Delicious SSD discounts||4|
|New Gmail accounts no longer require Google+||10|
|Some of Samsung's TLC SSDs are slow to read old data||27|
|Corsair releases RGB peripherals, intros Corsair Gaming division||23|
|Oculus unveils new VR headset prototype||34|
|Friday night topic: Conspiracy theories||249|
|You married well.||+49|