Part of the reason we've avoided doing so is that, let's face it, it has the potential to be kind of cheesy. There's much more to a CPU's value proposition than a cold cost-benefit analysis can capture, and in truth, doing such an analysis well can prove rather tricky. That's why you should read our CPU reviews and our system building guides to see what they recommend.
A vocal contingent of our readers has long been asking for a closer look at price-performance issues, and we think we've cooked up some novel ways of expressing that data that may make it feasible. So we've decided to give it a shot.
Fortuitously, AMD and Intel both took an axe to their prices last month, and we recently added Intel's $113 Core 2 Duo E4300 to our constellation of test results, so now seems like a particularly appropriate time to consider performance per dollar. Join us as we look at the value proposition of 16 CPUs, from the Athlon 64 X2 3600+ all the way up to the Core 2 Extreme QX6800, across a wide range of games, applications, and even energy efficiency tests. Some of what we found surprised us, and it may change the way you think about CPU value.
|Here's an early look at DX12 "Inside the Second" benchmark data||95|
|Deals of the week: an Asus ROG motherboard for $160 and more||3|
|Aero 14 notebooks pack gaming power into a slim profile||6|
|Gigabyte shrinks the GeForce GTX 1070 for Mini-ITX||9|
|Calyos workstation passively cools Haswell-E and a Titan X||13|
|Samsung starts selling unlocked Galaxy S7s in the USA||3|
|Rumor: GeForce GTX 1060 specs leak||48|
|Coolchip Technologies teases a low-profile "kinetic cooler"||23|
|EKWB has a full-coverage water block ready for the RX 480||27|