SpotTheCat wrote:Tell me about itHance wrote:Just popped in to see whats been going on and noticed I have been a member on TR for 10+ years. I feel old now
Hance wrote:The big question though is ram. Is the formula for ram still N+2 ? N being the current amount of ram you have and the number being the additional amount of ram you need
Captain Ned wrote:Hance wrote:The big question though is ram. Is the formula for ram still N+2 ? N being the current amount of ram you have and the number being the additional amount of ram you need
Nowadays it's X, where X is what the mobo will support.
Hance wrote:...Its cold somebody turn up the heat.
Hance wrote:You guys are a bad influence. Just what am I going to do with 32 gigs of ram
just brew it! wrote:Hance wrote:You guys are a bad influence. Just what am I going to do with 32 gigs of ram
Unless you're into messing around with VMs or doing photo editing on huge multi-layer high-res images, 16GB really should be enough. But if your mobo supports 32GB, it will make the system feel a lot smoother by allowing the OS to cache pretty much everything you're using at any given time, and completely eliminating the need for the OS to ever hit the pagefile.
These days I consider 8GB to be bare minimum for a new build, and 16GB to be "sweet spot" in terms of cost/performance.
just brew it! wrote:Problem is, once you get up beyond 32GB you're generally talking enterprise-class hardware and registered DIMMs. Things start to get expensive really fast.
Hance wrote:Zero photo editing for me, I leave that to the wife, she is fairly serious about her photography. Probably the most intense thing I do is edit and render videos. I don't even play games that much anymore.
Hance wrote:We are all going to be in trouble talking about computers in DYMT.
BIF wrote:I had pizza with an Amber Bock today; first time for the latter. It was delicious!
Oops! Sorry, folks.just brew it! wrote:Yeah, I was starting to get that "we're too on-topic here" vibe too!Hance wrote:We are all going to be in trouble talking about computers in DYMT.
Hance wrote:Crash test dummy ?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests