Kodak files for bankruptcy

Hang out, sip some ice tea, and shoot the breeze with TR regulars.

Moderators: emkubed, Captain Ned

Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:59 am

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ ... 0376.story

Key quote: "Now we must complete the transformation by further addressing our cost structure and effectively monetizing non-core intellectual-property assets."

In other words, "we're about to become a patent troll because that's the only option we've got left". Oh, how the mighty have fallen...
(this space intentionally left blank)
just brew it!
Administrator
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 36886
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:43 am

Kodak didn't catch onto the digital photography bandwagon until it was too late.

I believe the other photo giants are having similar aches as well (Olympus).
Ivy Bridge i5-3570K@4.0Ghz, Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H, 2x4GiB of PC-12800, EVGA 660Ti, Corsair CX-600 and Fractal Refined R4 (W). Kentsfield Q6600@3Ghz, HD 4850 2x2GiB PC2-6400, Gigabyte EP45-DS4P, OCZ Modstream 700W, and PC-7B.
Krogoth
Maximum Gerbil
Silver subscriber
 
 
Posts: 4380
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: somewhere on Core Prime

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:16 am

Krogoth wrote:Kodak didn't catch onto the digital photography bandwagon until it was too late.


On the contrary, Kodak built some of the very first digital cameras.

Krogoth wrote:I believe the other photo giants are having similar aches as well (Olympus).


That financial scandal is a completely different situation.
Anomymous Gerbil
Gerbil
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:51 am

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:59 am

Krogoth wrote:Kodak didn't catch onto the digital photography bandwagon until it was too late.


No, Kodak was making so much money from film, that old dinosaur did NOT want to make the painful switch. BAD management. Result? CEO got fired with a monster golden parachute but left Kodak unable to play catchup. Chinon was purchased to try and catch up, but made lousy low-grade consumer cameras. Too late...

BTW Kodak had a line of dSLR cameras early on that could be programmatically controlled via USB. These things were really nice but never took off. Sensors at the time couldn't compete with film yet. Kodak had a habit of bringing products to market long before the market was ready.

Krogoth wrote:I believe the other photo giants are having similar aches as well (Olympus).

Olympus is just a scandal-ridden business. Only Samsung's photo business is struggling since they cannot seem to penetrate the market well.

This whole thing is very disturbing since my parents are retirees from Kodak and depend on the health care benefits. My mom has ALS, my dad cancer. This sucks, and I put it all on poor management by investors and CEOs who got fat and lazy from easy film profits.
liquidsquid
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
 
Posts: 2437
Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 9:49 am
Location: New York

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:28 am

I have had a kodak P850 for ages it seems.5.1mp (12x) Schneider KREUZNACH Variogon F2.8-3.7 zoom lens with IS.I picked it up in late 2005, i have been very happy with its performance.It takes great macro pics and action shots.....low light performance is sub par without the flash but you get what you pay for.
2600k HT on@4705mhz 2x EVGA GTX770 4gb Classified cards running in SLI @1320 mhz core and 2003 mhz mem,mounted in CM HAF922.2xHTPC's 2xi3 2120 3.3ghz dual core,1xasus LP HD6570 1xHIS hd7750@1150core1325mem,55"PanyVT30
vargis14
Gerbil Elite
 
Posts: 973
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:03 pm
Location: philly suburbs

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:23 am

axeman wrote:Wow, this seems incredible. I don't feel sentimental about it, but this is one heckuva icon to bite the dust, although I'm sure the brand name has some value, so I'm sure at the least someone else will buy the rights to the name.

I actually hope that *doesn't* happen. Look at what happened to Memorex -- they were once a household name too (though not as big as Kodak), and now they are pretty much synonymous with "cheap re-branded crap".
(this space intentionally left blank)
just brew it!
Administrator
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 36886
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:30 am

just brew it! wrote:I actually hope that *doesn't* happen. Look at what happened to Memorex -- they were once a household name too (though not as big as Kodak), and now they are pretty much synonymous with "cheap re-branded crap".

Image
There are people that embrace the Oxford comma and people who don't. Never get between these people when drink has been taken. I use the Oxford comma and always will. The rest can sod off.
Captain Ned
Global Moderator
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 19735
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:50 am

Shouldn't the title of this thread really be "Kodak 'finally' files for bankruptcy"?

The founding fathers of the company told them to reinvest their profits in new technology and never stop innovating.

Instead the current leaders of the company did the exact opposite.
If you don't follow sound advice given by the father of the company you deserve everything you get.

They did really well up to about 20 years ago and then they thought they were on a never ending gravy train.

These guys were awesome not just in camera tech, but in any tech. Bunch of really smart guys who were some of the best chemists and engineers available anywhere.
I wish to see things not as they are but as they should be.
Aranarth
Gerbil Elite
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:56 am
Location: Big Rapids, Mich. (Est Time Zone)

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 9:37 am

Captain Ned wrote:
just brew it! wrote:I actually hope that *doesn't* happen. Look at what happened to Memorex -- they were once a household name too (though not as big as Kodak), and now they are pretty much synonymous with "cheap re-branded crap".

Image

Pretty sure that's actually from an old Maxell poster, not Memorex.
(this space intentionally left blank)
just brew it!
Administrator
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 36886
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 9:56 am

just brew it! wrote:I actually hope that *doesn't* happen. Look at what happened to Memorex -- they were once a household name too (though not as big as Kodak), and now they are pretty much synonymous with "cheap re-branded crap".

...maybe Voxx can buy them and send their memories to hell like Acoustic Research and Advent. :(
It's hilarious that the same people who laud the "benefits" of 16x9 aspect ratios also praise Chrome for "freeing up screen space."
Image
Windows XP will never die!
kvndoom
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
 
Posts: 2373
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 10:47 pm
Location: Communistwealth of Virginia

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:20 am

Kodak had its fingerprints in the digital market well in time to transition, both consumer and professional, but couldn't figure it out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QuickTake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_D2000

Apple moved on to other things, Canon was smart enough to stay with the technology, Kodak died.
He who laughs last, laughs first next time.
ludi
Gerbil Elder
 
Posts: 5320
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 9:47 pm
Location: Sunny Colorado front range

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:34 am

Kodak did have early digtal cameras, the thing was that their business didn't take a serious attempt at going digital until it was too late. They hinged most of their business model on film. It wasn't just the cameras, but film development and processing.

The other competitors went with color printers to tie with the digital photography which is why they are still standing today.

Kodak fell from a combination of bad management and allowing the competition to seize the next big thing.
Ivy Bridge i5-3570K@4.0Ghz, Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H, 2x4GiB of PC-12800, EVGA 660Ti, Corsair CX-600 and Fractal Refined R4 (W). Kentsfield Q6600@3Ghz, HD 4850 2x2GiB PC2-6400, Gigabyte EP45-DS4P, OCZ Modstream 700W, and PC-7B.
Krogoth
Maximum Gerbil
Silver subscriber
 
 
Posts: 4380
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: somewhere on Core Prime

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:59 am

Pensions are safe, it is the health care which is doomed.

Kodak was an amazing business, they knew how to treat employees very well and raised the bar very high in great places to work. My family was what was called enviously back then: "Kodak Family" meaning you didn't work crazy ours, you were rewarded for hard work, you got to take your vacations, you got to enjoy free concerts and events, you were not expected to work from home, and so on. That is the saddest legacy of Kodak to go away IMHO.

It has been a long slope of treating employees as assets instead to become treating them as a liability. Meanwhile top management over the past 20 years have not been held accountable for horrible decisions up to now.
liquidsquid
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
 
Posts: 2437
Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 9:49 am
Location: New York

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:22 am

The article the OP posted forgot to mention that Kodak is suing Apple, Samsung and Fuji for "patent infringement" as a way to shore up its financials (and to make itself more attractive for investors to takeover).

DIAF, patent troll.
Wind, Sand and Stars.
Voldenuit
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
 
Posts: 2421
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 10:10 pm

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:55 am

Cash cows deserve to die.

I have zero sympathy for the greedy execs that ruined the company. Their golden handshake was probably more money than I'll earn in my lifetime.
<insert large, flashing, epileptic-fit-inducing signature (based on the latest internet-meme) here>
Chrispy_
Graphmaster Gerbil
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 1460
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:49 pm

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:04 pm

liquidsquid wrote:It has been a long slope of treating employees as assets instead to become treating them as a liability.


It's hard not to think that way when you still have to pay for them after they are no longer employees. Actually, it's illegal.

But that's R&P territory. (ducks)
Glorious
Darth Gerbil
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 7761
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 5:35 pm

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:04 pm

I grew up in Rochester, N.Y. where Kodak was located, when I moved away in 94, Kodak still had a huge footprint in the city as far as real estate.
Every 5 years or so when I'd go back for a visit, it seems they were occupying less real estate , as of last time I was in Rochester, 9 years ago, there was barely
a visible footprint of them. Kodak was truly an icon in Rochester and now yet another American giant bites the dust.
ASUS P5B-E,ConroeE6400,2GB Mushkin DDR2 800,
EVGA 8800GTS,Corsair 520HX,Antec 900,WD320 GB,Samsung 204B
rogue426
Graphmaster Gerbil
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:51 pm

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:33 pm

In '94 the chemical side of the company spun off and became Eastman Chemical, which has done quite well. They have a large and growing IP portfolio and a large customer base for actual products, as well. They sold many chemical precursors to Kodak back when Kodak was still doing a good business making photographic film. Now, not so much.
This problem was caused by Windows, which was created by Microsoft Corporation.
sluggo
Gerbil Jedi
 
Posts: 1530
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:44 pm
Location: under the table and dreaming

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:52 am

axeman wrote:I didn't say I am excited about the prospect, either. :wink: What I really meant is it's probably inevitable the brand will live on, in fact that really irritates me as well. Like Compaq living on on bargain basement HP laptops, ugh.

In Compaq's case, that's actually a huge step up in quality perceived value, at least for me. :D
I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do, I do not do. But what I hate, I do.
derFunkenstein
Gerbil God
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 21140
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:13 pm
Location: WHAT?

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:51 am

The old Compaq laptops we have at the office are (or at least were 5 years ago...) pretty nice. The last HP we got was junk.
(this space intentionally left blank)
just brew it!
Administrator
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 36886
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:27 am

For the average person, the camera capabilities of his iPhone or similar android smartphone give amazing pictures, the indications for having a physical printed picture are shrinking, and the justification for having to carry around a device that only takes pictures is being forced to take lots of pictures all the time. The nail in the coffin was the smart phone revolution.
i7 2600k @4.4 ghz 1.26v - GA-P67X-UD3 - 16gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600mhz - Evga Geforce GTX 570 - 2x 120gb Vertex 3 Raid-0 - Seagate Barracude 1.5TB - Silverstone FT02- HP 2709M Monitor
Sunburn74
Gerbil Team Leader
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:45 am

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Tue Feb 14, 2012 8:51 am

I guess you could say Lady Gaga got lucky in joining Polaroid over Kodak! lol
thegleek
Darth Gerbil
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:11 am

thegleek wrote:I guess you could say Lady Gaga got lucky in joining Polaroid over Kodak! lol

Not really. The original Polaroid filed for bankruptcy in 2001, and is effectively dead and gone. The company that currently has the rights to the name filed for bankruptcy in 2008 after investigations into potential criminal wrongdoing by their new ownership. Doesn't sound like much of a winner to me!
(this space intentionally left blank)
just brew it!
Administrator
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 36886
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:36 am

I guess the moral of this story is Adapt or Perish.

Kodak's problems are two-fold: excessively greedy management :evil: and a near-paralyzing fear :o of cannibalizing its own cash cows. If neither happened, Kodak might still actually be viable now and have no need for bankruptcy. Then again, I wish the banks had actually been allowed to go bankrupt and then the USA would be in great shape now. Problem is is that they can buy their way out of creative destruction, unlike almost all other industries and companies.

Now if only MPAA and RIAA would stop treating customers as felons. . . . .
Laptop: HP Pavilion 17-e016dx. AMD A8-5550M, 4GB RAM, 750GB HDD, AMD Radeon HD 8550G integrated video, 17.3" display, 1600*900 (HD+) resolution, SD card reader, Windows 8.1 (DL Classic Shell)
riviera74
Gerbil Elite
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 5:14 am
Location: FM, FL, USA

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:39 am

R :cough: P
Glorious
Darth Gerbil
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 7761
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 5:35 pm

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:40 am

Glorious wrote:R :cough: P

Send it!
thegleek
Darth Gerbil
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:50 am

hey now, I'm no mod.
Glorious
Darth Gerbil
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 7761
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 5:35 pm

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:56 am

I was never really impressed with Kodak's digital cameras. They were adequate, I guess, for point-and-shoot stuff, but it seemed to me there were better options available for the same amount of money.
My specs: GE Spacemaker JVM2052SNSS | 1050.0 Watts | 3 speed turntable | 2.0 cu ft | Quick 1 lb Defrost
Vrock
Gerbil God
 
Posts: 20453
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: The Land of the Looney Lolcats

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:06 am

Vrock wrote:I was never really impressed with Kodak's digital cameras. They were adequate, I guess, for point-and-shoot stuff, but it seemed to me there were better options available for the same amount of money.

They can't possibly have sucked more than the Olympus FE-25 I picked up a few years back.

(Have a Canon now... much better!)
(this space intentionally left blank)
just brew it!
Administrator
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 36886
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Kodak files for bankruptcy

Postposted on Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:58 am

just brew it! wrote:
Vrock wrote:I was never really impressed with Kodak's digital cameras. They were adequate, I guess, for point-and-shoot stuff, but it seemed to me there were better options available for the same amount of money.

They can't possibly have sucked more than the Olympus FE-25 I picked up a few years back.

(Have a Canon now... much better!)
Olympus used to make some of the better digital cams back in the early 2000's, IIRC. We have a Canon now and have been pleased with it.
My specs: GE Spacemaker JVM2052SNSS | 1050.0 Watts | 3 speed turntable | 2.0 cu ft | Quick 1 lb Defrost
Vrock
Gerbil God
 
Posts: 20453
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: The Land of the Looney Lolcats

Next

Return to The Back Porch

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bthylafh, MSNbot Media, SoM, Yahoo [Bot] and 11 guests