Kodak files for bankruptcy

[just brew it!]

I was never really impressed with Kodak's digital cameras. They were adequate, I guess, for point-and-shoot stuff, but it seemed to me there were better options available for the same amount of money.

They can't possibly have sucked more than the Olympus FE-25 I picked up a few years back.

(Have a Canon now... much better!)

[Vrock]

I was never really impressed with Kodak's digital cameras. They were adequate, I guess, for point-and-shoot stuff, but it seemed to me there were better options available for the same amount of money.

They can't possibly have sucked more than the Olympus FE-25 I picked up a few years back.

(Have a Canon now... much better!)

Olympus used to make some of the better digital cams back in the early 2000's, IIRC. We have a Canon now and have been pleased with it.

[just brew it!]

Olympus also made some decent 35mm point-and-shoot cameras back in the day. That's why I was surprised at how bad some of their recent digicams apparently are.

[anotherengineer]

[/quote]No, Kodak was making so much money from film, that old dinosaur did NOT want to make the painful switch. BAD on poor management by investors and CEOs who got fat and lazy from easy film profits.[/quote]

EDIT BY MOD - Captain Ned - Blatant R&P removed.