4th gen ipod nanos

From OSX to iPods, iTunes to Mac Minis, and all other things Apple.

Moderators: David, Thresher

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:42 am

tanker27 wrote:
pete_roth wrote:I just like to do it myself, it's not just a knock on iTunes, it's a knock on anythign that wants to manage it for me. I like to do it myself, and ideally I could drag and drop into the device's HDD myself.




Are talking about dragging and dropping song files to the player instead of syncing? Or are you talking about dragging and dropping "other" files to move data?

If it the latter then you can "unlock" the Apple device so it can be recognized as a USB mass storage device. You dont ;ose any functionality and all it really does is lets you see the file structure of the device.

There are also third party SW out there that can do this too.


http://www.mediafour.com/products/xplay/
Laptop: HP Pavilion 17-e016dx. AMD A8-5550M, 4GB RAM, 750GB HDD, AMD Radeon HD 8550G integrated video, 17.3" display, 1600*900 (HD+) resolution, SD card reader, Windows 8.1 (DL Classic Shell)
riviera74
Gerbil Elite
 
Posts: 865
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 6:14 am
Location: FM, FL, USA

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:44 am

I have a different question about the Nano. Why does iTunes work better in OSX than in Windows?
Laptop: HP Pavilion 17-e016dx. AMD A8-5550M, 4GB RAM, 750GB HDD, AMD Radeon HD 8550G integrated video, 17.3" display, 1600*900 (HD+) resolution, SD card reader, Windows 8.1 (DL Classic Shell)
riviera74
Gerbil Elite
 
Posts: 865
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 6:14 am
Location: FM, FL, USA

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:01 am

riviera74 wrote:I have a different question about the Nano. Why does iTunes work better in OSX than in Windows?


'cause Mac, "It just works." 8)

/shrug.

I personally think anything on OSX works better than its PC counterpart, if there is one.
(\_/)
(O.o)
(''')(''')
Wounded Warrior Project
Watch out for evil Terra-Tron; He Does not like you!
tanker27
Darth Gerbil
 
Posts: 7326
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:03 am

riviera74 wrote:I have a different question about the Nano. Why does iTunes work better in OSX than in Windows?

Because iTunes can get OS hooks written for it on OS X and in Windows it needs to comply with the Windows API.

Or at least, that's my guess. But I don't find it has too many problems on Windows (by which I mean, it hasn't ever had problems for me, except that annoying one in Vista64 where it loses write permissions onto its catalogue file and you need to restart).
Core i7 920, 3x2GB Corsair DDR3 1600, 80GB X25-M, 1TB WD Caviar Black, MSI X58 Pro-E, Radeon 4890, Cooler Master iGreen 600, Antec P183, opticals
SNM
Emperor Gerbilius I
 
Posts: 6206
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 10:37 am

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:36 am

Apple's Windows software is universally piggish and slow. Safari, QuickTime, iTunes...on the same hardware (a Mac Mini) they're all much slower in Boot Camp than in OS X. Not sure what the deal is, but I'm blissfully able to get around it by using the right OS. :lol:
I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do, I do not do. But what I hate, I do.
derFunkenstein
Gerbil God
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 21489
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 9:13 pm
Location: WHAT?

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:50 am

riviera74 wrote:I have a different question about the Nano. Why does iTunes work better in OSX than in Windows?
The same reason Safari on OS X is better than Safari on Windows.
lordT
Darth Gerbil
 
Posts: 7426
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: Writing

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:27 pm

SNM wrote:
riviera74 wrote:I have a different question about the Nano. Why does iTunes work better in OSX than in Windows?

Because iTunes can get OS hooks written for it on OS X and in Windows it needs to comply with the Windows API.


Likely. iTunes just has higher access to resources in OS X I guess.

I personally think anything on OSX works better than its PC counterpart, if there is one.


Same here, although apparently starting with Photoshop CS4 things will be different.
ssidbroadcast
Graphmaster Gerbil
Silver subscriber
 
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 10:42 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:32 pm

Hey pete, is the 1GB the only reason you want to replace the Clip? If so I suggest you take a look here for some additional recommendations. I will also add the older Sansa E2xx (you can buy the lower capacity one for the cheap price and expand it with micro-SDHC cards) as well.
Image
The Model M is not for the faint of heart. You either like them or hate them.

Gerbils unite! Fold for UnitedGerbilNation, team 2630.
Flying Fox
Gerbil God
 
Posts: 24520
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 2:19 am

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:41 pm

Flying Fox wrote:Hey pete, is the 1GB the only reason you want to replace the Clip? If so I suggest you take a look here for some additional recommendations. I will also add the older Sansa E2xx (you can buy the lower capacity one for the cheap price and expand it with micro-SDHC cards) as well.



Well I lost it, or it was stolen from my gym bag but I can't prove it. The 1Gb wasn't bad, i changed out what I wanted every night anyhow. My biggest gripe was the randomness of the shuffle was AWFUL. I'm looking at the Sony walkman 8Gb, looks sexy.
Corsair 600T | ASUS P8P67 PRO | Intel 2500k @ 4.4Ghz | EVGA 560 TI | G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 8GB | Corsair HX650 650W
steelcity_ballin
Gerbilus Supremus
Silver subscriber
 
 
Posts: 11924
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 5:55 am
Location: Pittsburgh PA

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:13 pm

pete_roth wrote:
Flying Fox wrote:Hey pete, is the 1GB the only reason you want to replace the Clip? If so I suggest you take a look here for some additional recommendations. I will also add the older Sansa E2xx (you can buy the lower capacity one for the cheap price and expand it with micro-SDHC cards) as well.



Well I lost it, or it was stolen from my gym bag but I can't prove it. The 1Gb wasn't bad, i changed out what I wanted every night anyhow. My biggest gripe was the randomness of the shuffle was AWFUL. I'm looking at the Sony walkman 8Gb, looks sexy.

The Sony's are good too, especially since they dumped their stupid proprietary program and stick with USB transfers a while back. As long as you don't need the fancy stuff like FLAC and OGG I would ok with the Sony's if you like the look and UI.
Image
The Model M is not for the faint of heart. You either like them or hate them.

Gerbils unite! Fold for UnitedGerbilNation, team 2630.
Flying Fox
Gerbil God
 
Posts: 24520
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 2:19 am

Re: 4th gen ipod nanos

Postposted on Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:16 pm

Go to a store and fondle everything you can get your hands on thats the way your going to make the most informed choice. The iPod touch is really like a palm pilot on steroids thats why I like mine so much.
Hance
Darth Gerbil
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 7641
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2003 1:58 pm
Location: Grace Idaho

Previous

Return to Apple Sanctuary

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests