emorgoch wrote:The question will be what I do with my old components at that point. Might put together that home NAS that I've been meaning to do.
The only thing promising is the price will be high.mmmmmdonuts21 wrote:On the other hand the 2011LGA looks very very promising.
That is because that "promising" 2011 platform is coming and 1366 is as done as 1156. For Intel usually it means new CPU architecture == new motherboard. Don't like it? Jump to AMD but you may still "get burned" (some people think like that, I don't), like this AM3+ business.kamikaziechameleon wrote:Am I wrong it observing that 1366 hasn't seen a major refresh since the initial launch, only that 1,000 dollar six core? The whole line is still kinda chillin 2 years later?
flip-mode wrote:Could you Edit the option that says "My i5/i7 runs fine" to something more inclusive? I have a Phenom II that runs fine. I've got absolutely no reason to upgrade it. I'm sure there are people with Core 2 quads that feel the same.
I'm extremely impressed with Sandy Bridge and I'd love to have one, but there's nothing I do that would make the upgrade worth it or even noticeable. I just plain wouldn't notice it! I can't rightly spend $500 and not be able to notice the difference. Heck, my 955 BE is running at stock. A 5770 runs games just fine for me at 1600x1200 so I don't need to upgrade that either. What I do need to upgrade is my storage.
crimsonjax wrote:Still sporting my e6300, 8 years old and still rockin! My daughter will soon take it over after I build me a shiny, new Sandybridge platform PC..
Flying Fox wrote:crimsonjax wrote:Still sporting my e6300, 8 years old and still rockin! My daughter will soon take it over after I build me a shiny, new Sandybridge platform PC..
Core 2 Duo E6300 in 2003/2004?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests