SpotTheCat wrote:edit: it changes anything ending in ing to four stars, making it harder to get the idea of what you're saying.
excession wrote:so is **** a badword then?
axeman wrote:Maybe you could leave out F S C K for the linux forum?
derFunkenstein wrote:Oh, interesting. Now when you quote someone, you don't see what they wrote...so it's apparently stored as "****" instead of the original word.
Kevin wrote:I think it's always done that.
derFunkenstein wrote:Not that it matters, but I went into a PM that predates the new filter, and when I hit "quote" it shows the unfiltered word. If I quote something that's post-new-filter, it shows as asterisks. However, if I *edit* something I posted, it shows the real word still. This filter is **** up, yo
action jim wrote:No, I'm saying "If someone is an @sshole online, odds are they are an @sshole IRL, or would be an @ssole if they had the chance." You're saying there's no correlation, which I think is 100% off.
thegleek wrote: ****
PerfectCr wrote:thegleek wrote: ****
thegleek wrote:Did you know as a factoid, that kids in India and pretty much many other Eastern countries, the word **** is not a bad word and is learned at a very early age and is used quite commonly in everyday language?
thegleek wrote:I'm on high-probation around here now, so I'm trying not to shake things up for me!
Capsaicin wrote:A little too long staring at the screen, huh?Kevin wrote:You need to work on your reading compression.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest