Which monitor is better for gaming and watching movies ?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6824005085
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6824001095
Moderators: Dposcorp, SpotTheCat

That is basically the DVI cable right there. Both LG and Samsung use their own panels and they are pretty good. Possibly even as they are both TN panels anyway. Is there a way you can go see them for yourself?maroon1 wrote:But does anyone know which one will produce better image quality ?
The LG monitor is $50 cheaper than sumsung here in my country.

Fighterpilot wrote:The Samsung is the better of the two.
I'm ordering one next week.
This one (Acer 2051W) however is better than both if you can get it in your country.
It's not available here in Japan.
Should be based on panel type. The Acer is P-MVA. If you win the Dell 2007 panel lottery and get the S-IPS panel, then S-IPS > P-MVA. If not, I would expect them to be similar since both will be P-MVA.FireGryphon wrote:How does the Acer compare to the Dell 2007 WFP?

Fighterpilot wrote:This one (Acer 2051W) however is better than both if you can get it in your country.
If all you think about is games, games, and more games, then sure, get as low response time as you like. If you care about things like colour reproduction, then yeah, those non-TN panels are way better.maroon1 wrote:Fighterpilot wrote:This one (Acer 2051W) however is better than both if you can get it in your country.
Are you kidding ?
According to this website Acer monitor have only 800:1 contrast ratio and 8ms Response time http://www.nextag.com/acer-2051-w/search-html
How could a monitor than have a contrast ratio of 800:1 and 8ms Response time be better than a monitor that have 3000:1 and 2ms Response time like the Samsung monitor ?

Flying Fox wrote:Samsung use their own panels
maroon1 wrote:Fighterpilot wrote:This one (Acer 2051W) however is better than both if you can get it in your country.
Are you kidding ?
According to this website Acer monitor have only 800:1 contrast ratio and 8ms Response time http://www.nextag.com/acer-2051-w/search-html
How could a monitor than have a contrast ratio of 800:1 and 8ms Response time be better than a monitor that have 3000:1 and 2ms Response time like the Samsung monitor ?
DVI cables don't have to cost anywhere near $50.Flying Fox wrote:That is basically the DVI cable right there. Both LG and Samsung use their own panels and they are pretty good. Possibly even as they are both TN panels anyway. Is there a way you can go see them for yourself?maroon1 wrote:But does anyone know which one will produce better image quality ?
The LG monitor is $50 cheaper than sumsung here in my country.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Khali, MSN NewsBlogs and 2 guests