EDIT: I'm looking at the Panasonc TH50Pz77u-50 and Samsung FPT5084 are my two top contenders atm.
Moderators: Dposcorp, SpotTheCat

Has Sharp sorted out their screen uniformity and banding problmes yet?PRIME1 wrote:If you don't mind a refurb you can get one of the best sets available for $1999
1080p+120hz+52"
http://www.buy.com/prod/sharp-lc-52d82u ... 79050.html
IMO, either is a fine choice. The Sammy's colors are a bit more accurate IIRC, but the Panny is nice too.paulWTAMU wrote:EDIT: I'm looking at the Panasonc TH50Pz77u-50 and Samsung FPT5084 are my two top contenders atm.
Vrock wrote:Congrats on the TV and receiver! Killer deal on the TV. The receiver is okay for now but you'll want to upgrade later. It will only switch HDMI, so you'll still need a seperate audio connection via optical or coax. Which means no lossless sound when you get the PS3, but oh well. Really unless you're short HDMI ports on the TV there's no reason to use the receiver's.

I bought a similar set last year, the TH-50PZ700U, and I couldn't be happier. I bought mine at an Ultimate Electronics $2600 last August, so I'm guessing that the prices have gone down by now, or there's been a replacement model that's been released. The Panny set that you listed has a higher contrast ratio, 10000:1 compared to my 5000:1, and a whole .1 inch extra of screen real estate, but that's about it. The contrast on my set is perfect for me, and I even had to turn it down some. Not to mention, the PZ700U has more inputs than the set you mentioned. Again, if you can find one, I highly recommend it. But, if you end up getting the 50PZ77U, I can all but guarantee that you won't be disappointed.paulWTAMU wrote:EDIT: I'm looking at the Panasonc TH50Pz77u-50...
Flying Fox wrote:Vrock wrote:Congrats on the TV and receiver! Killer deal on the TV. The receiver is okay for now but you'll want to upgrade later. It will only switch HDMI, so you'll still need a seperate audio connection via optical or coax. Which means no lossless sound when you get the PS3, but oh well. Really unless you're short HDMI ports on the TV there's no reason to use the receiver's.
I'm a noob. Where did it say it can't decode the audio portion of the HDMI?
No, you still need to connect the speakers to the receiver.paulWTAMU wrote:So I don't actually need to connect the speakers to the receiver? Thanks
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests