Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, Dposcorp, SpotTheCat
Voldenuit wrote:Then again, I never touch P mode because I don't trust the camera to do what I want it to.
titan wrote:The expression on their faces when I tell them that I don't edit the photos, I just do it right. P. R. I. C. E. L. E. S. S.
Digital photography without editing them? That's unpossible!
JustAnEngineer wrote:Changing the ISO on the EOS 40D just requires pushing a dedicated button then spinning the top wheel. You can see the ISO displayed on the top LCD, on the rear screen and in the viewfinder. No menus are required.
Madman wrote:titan wrote:The expression on their faces when I tell them that I don't edit the photos, I just do it right. P. R. I. C. E. L. E. S. S.
Digital photography without editing them? That's unpossible!
Still, good post processing can be beneficial. I know professional photographers who scan the negatives from film cameras at insane resolutions and post-process them later on. Professional sharpening can still do wonders.
JustAnEngineer wrote:Changing the ISO on the EOS 40D just requires pushing a dedicated button then spinning the top wheel. You can see the ISO displayed on the top LCD, on the rear screen and in the viewfinder. No menus are required.
Voldenuit wrote:@ Titan. Sometimes, the 'proper' way to take a shot is to expose incorrectly, then PP. For instance, I might underexpose a bright scene to preserve highlight detail, then adjust the curves/exposure in PP. If one were to expose "correctly", that might mean blowing out the highlights and losing the information there.