opinons on plasma vs led

What you see is what you get, including photography, displays, and video equipment.

Moderators: Dposcorp, SpotTheCat

opinons on plasma vs led

Postposted on Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:25 am

So my 42" Sony Grand Wega has bit the dust after 5 years, so looking at a replacement unit.
My TV room is completely windowless, and the TV is about 13-15 feet from the viewing couch.
I watch mainly broadcast HD shows, some sports.. kids play Wii.. I'll probably pick up a BR player at some point.

My questions:

Are LED TV's really worth the extra cost?
Is there a "sweet-spot" for size? ( was thinking a 55"-60" unit)
Is 120Hz/240Hz worth it?
Worth getting extended warranty? Are there really user-servicable parts?

Thanks in advance for any opinions and advice :)
i7-4770K-32Gb DDR3-1600-MSI GTX670 Power-Intel 520 120gb SSD-Asus Xonar DX-Dell U2711
elmopuddy
Gerbil Elite
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2001 6:00 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: opinons on plasma vs led

Postposted on Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:01 am

1/ Just to be clear, the "LED TV's" are just an LCD TV that is either Edgelit or backlit by LED's instead of CCFL's. The pixels themselves aren't individual LED's.
2/ The sweetspot for size is basically determined by your budget and your viewing distance. The rule of thumb is that the largest you can comfortably go is a ratio of VD = 1.5 * SD where SD = screen diagonal and VD is viewing distance. Sitting 8' away would mean the largest TV you should look at would be about 64".
3/ 120/240hz. Make sure to get a TV that supports native 24p content and a BD player that supports 24p output. That's a bigger deal for movies than a 120/240/480hz TV.

EDIT: By the way, in your situation I would certainly go with a Plasma. Panasonic's units are top-notch. The VT line is the cream-of-the-crop.
Last edited by Usacomp2k3 on Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Usacomp2k3
Gerbil God
 
Posts: 21240
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 3:53 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: opinons on plasma vs led

Postposted on Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:09 pm

LCDs with LED backlights use less power and last longer than LCDs with fluorescent backlights, but the CCFLs may provide a wider color gamut.

An LED backlight array with local dimming can provide superior contrast, but those sets are not very common and they are rather expensive.
http://reviews.cnet.com/2795-6482_7-399.html

$3600 from Sony. Is it 2¼ times as good as one with fewer features?
i7-4770K, H70, Gryphon Z87, 16 GiB, R9-290, SSD, 2 HD, Blu-ray, SB ZX, TJ08-E, SS-660XP², 3007WFP+2001FP, RK-9000BR, MX518
JustAnEngineer
Gerbil God
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 15147
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: The Heart of Dixie

Re: opinons on plasma vs led

Postposted on Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:21 am

I second the panasonic plasma. The picture is incredible and they do very well with non-native resolutions, almost like a crt.
Derfer
Gerbil
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:05 pm

Re: opinons on plasma vs led

Postposted on Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:24 am

normally I would recommend you get a 50" panasonic plasma but....
check LED prices, if you can get a 46" or larger in ur budget, the LED might look much brighter and u may be happier
potatochobit
Gerbil Elite
 
Posts: 919
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:56 pm

Re: opinons on plasma vs led

Postposted on Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:58 am

I think there's not much difference between the high end LCD / plasmas these days, the main reason I would choose plasma is its better with fast moving images and black levels. The main reason I would choose LCD is because they don't get the same amount of glare that can reflect from the glass on a plasma, thinner and lighter form factor.

I think the image quality is high enough that most are 'good enough' these days, and if you want to get picky its more about +/-'s of particular models than purely being about plasma or lcd.
blitzy
Gerbil Jedi
 
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: opinons on plasma vs led

Postposted on Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:40 am

blitzy wrote:I think there's not much difference between the high end LCD / plasmas these days, the main reason I would choose plasma is its better with fast moving images and black levels. The main reason I would choose LCD is because they don't get the same amount of glare that can reflect from the glass on a plasma, thinner and lighter form factor.

I think the image quality is high enough that most are 'good enough' these days, and if you want to get picky its more about +/-'s of particular models than purely being about plasma or lcd.


Something like this;

Put simply:

Dark room -> Plasma
Not dark room -> LCD
Light gaming -> either
Real gaming -> Plasma
Canon 6D||[24-105/4L IS USM|100/2.8L Macro IS USM|70-300/4-5.6 IS USM|40/2.8 STM|50/1.4 USM|85/1.8 USM|Samyang/Bower 14/2.8 Full-Manual Rectilinear Wide-angle|
Canon EOS-M|11-22/4-5.6 IS STM|22/2 STM|EF-M 18-55/3.5-5.6 IS STM|
For sale!|24/2.8 IS USM
|
Airmantharp
Maximum Gerbil
 
Posts: 4695
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 9:41 pm

Re: opinons on plasma vs led

Postposted on Sat Mar 19, 2011 1:48 am

I have a Vizio vf551xvt with local dimming and it's great. Reviewers think so too. And this set is a couple years old now.

Plasma is better, but if you're sensitive to the visual artifacts that go with them then it's not an option.
My specs: GE Spacemaker JVM2052SNSS | 1050.0 Watts | 3 speed turntable | 2.0 cu ft | Quick 1 lb Defrost
Vrock
Gerbil God
 
Posts: 20455
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: The Land of the Looney Lolcats


Return to Visual Haven

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest