TurtlePerson2 wrote:As a side note, 100 C is pretty impressive. Most chips are not tested at that temperature. I'm surprised that it was still working correctly.
canmnanone wrote:i dont think you can kill a processor by over volt, oc temp. it will throttle down or just freeze. people say that an oc will kill a processor over time but i have my oc q6600 3.6gig running 24/7 for over 3 years now its hasnt died on me yet. maybe time will tell if it does or not. but its been running strong from the start.
StuffMaster wrote:I seem to recall that the P3 added the ability to shut off when overheating and the P4 could throttle down as is done today. Perhaps common wisdom about killing processors dates back to earlier days.
FireGryphon wrote:Back in the day a site called Tom's Hardware (a false and unreliable site) took some videos of what happened to various chips if they overheated.
just brew it! wrote:FireGryphon wrote:Back in the day a site called Tom's Hardware (a false and unreliable site) took some videos of what happened to various chips if they overheated.
While I'm not a fan of Tom's either, considering the poor design of early Socket A HSF retention mechanisms it wasn't *totally* unreasonable to ask the question "What happens to the CPU if the HSF comes loose while the system is running?"
TurtlePerson2 wrote:The part of the processor that breaks is not the transistors. The integrated circuit elements are not destroyed by 3 volts. A few hundred volts might destroy a gate oxide, but a minor change in voltage shouldn't cause any transistor problems.
ludi wrote:TurtlePerson2 wrote:I don't know how much of a problem this is on modern devices, especially given the complex power and clock management technologies that prevent the user from doing whatever they want. In the old days, the chip simply had to accept whatever input voltage and clock it was given, and either it worked at those parameters, or it didn't. Or in the case of a K6-2/400 I experimented on, it worked at 504MHz for a while but became increasingly unstable, and then it wasn't stable at 450MHz, and then it wasn't stable at 400MHz. Then it sat in a workbench drawer two years, and when I gave it to a relative with fair warning, it started working at 400MHz again, and did so for a couple more years. Go figure.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 5 guests