ok get this, I've ran windows 95, 98 se, ME, 2000 pro with SP-2, AND XP pro on the same machine (all separately, never dual booted them), and I'll admit, I actually do like XP pro the best. I dont really care much for whats on my computer, just the stuff I mainly want and use. Windows 95, 98, and ME were all a little buggy but did get progressively better, and far as 2k's stability, it was solid but the interfacing could use a little revamping, and as far as xp pro goes, since it is supposedly just the next version of win2k, you technically DO have win2k installed with a few clean-ups here and there, but on the downside, they added more unnecessary stuff to it too, but that can be easily fixed though, there's always a way to uninstall certain softwares. Also, I dont remember seeing the compatibility mode thing in win2k. Its really helpful for backward moding. I found a few things from back in the days that I could even think about running in win 2k, but with xp just set the compatibility and it was done just like that. The only 1 thing that i did NOT like about 2k was that for some reason it was REALLY slowing down my old ass computer! Given that my computer sucks and its ancient, I just wonder why I havent had any problems with any of the other OS's like that. On a final note, if you decide to clean install XP pro, make sure you have atleast 4 gigs space for it. I've got my system files on a totally separate partition, I havent installed too much on my computer yet either, and I'd like to think that I keep my drives fairly clean, with all that said and done, the system files have taken up just under 2 gigs of space so far, thats including all the updates/patches/fixes for win xp pro.
Well I told you I'd give my 2 cents and instead I gave you the whole damn dollar, so I'll shutup now, hope my blabbering was useful to anybody out there.