Player Hater wrote:I get what you guys are saying. I'm thinking about something a little different though. With the BEEF and MILK campaigns, they are selling BEEF and MILK, those are the products being offered for sale. With this Linux thing, you aren't really buying Linux, you are buying IBM machines that run Linux.
I think it is a bit more subtle than that... they are trying to increase awareness of Linux in the marketplace. And since they are a major vendor of hardware that runs Linux, they will reap a correspondingly large reward when people switch to Linux.
Couldn't some other company come along and do the same exact ad but with their company logo at the end instead of IBM's? They are basically selling the same free stuff that IBM is advertising, what would be wrong with that?
Aside from the fact that the ad itself is probably copyrighted, there would be nothing wrong with that at all.
I understand that this is a big up for the Linux world but I dont get why they did it. Anyone can have Linux for free, why advertise that. They should be promoting their machines. Thats part of the reason IBM stock took a huge nosedive in the mid 90's is cuz they have some great advertising but you never know what they are really selling.
There are probably a number of reasons why they did it... of the top of my head:
- The reason I touched on above (i.e. what's good for Linux is good for IBM).
- It's pretty hard to make file/web server hardware exciting... and IBM is a decades-old company, still seen by many as the last major holdout in the "big iron" (mainframe) market. Maybe they are hoping that Linux will be seen as new and exciting... and by implication, IBM will be perceived as innovative and forward-looking.
- Reassure the public that they're not backing away from their commitment to Linux as a result the SCO lawsuit.
- Paint Linux as "the good guy", and (by inference) SCO as "the bad guy".
- All of the above?