Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, farmpuma, just brew it!
[07:47:04] + Attempting to send results [February 24 07:47:04 UTC]
[07:47:04] - Reading file work/wuresults_00.dat from core
[07:47:04] (Read 20437313 bytes from disk)
[07:47:04] Connecting to http://171.64.65.54:8080/
[07:48:17] Posted data.
[07:48:17] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~273 kB/s
[07:48:17] - Averaged speed for that direction ~267 kB/s
[07:48:17] - Server reports digital signature does not match.
[07:48:17] (May be due to corruption during network transmission or a corrupted file.)
[07:48:17] - Error: Could not transmit unit 00 (completed February 18) to work server.
[07:48:17] - 48 failed uploads of this unit.
[07:48:17] + Attempting to send results [February 24 07:48:17 UTC]
[07:48:17] - Reading file work/wuresults_00.dat from core
[07:48:17] (Read 20437313 bytes from disk)
[07:48:17] Connecting to http://171.67.108.25:8080/
[07:48:25] Posted data.
[07:48:25] Initial: 0000; + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[07:48:25] (171.67.108.25:8080)
[07:48:25] + Retrying using alternative port
[07:48:25] Connecting to http://171.67.108.25:80/
[07:48:34] Posted data.
[07:48:34] Initial: 0000; + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[07:48:34] (171.67.108.25:80)
[07:48:34] Could not transmit unit 00 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[07:48:34] Project: 6021 (Run 0, Clone 98, Gen 25)
[07:48:34] + Attempting to send results [February 24 07:48:34 UTC]
[07:48:34] - Reading file work/wuresults_01.dat from core
[07:48:34] (Read 20437318 bytes from disk)
[07:48:34] Connecting to http://171.64.65.54:8080/
[07:49:53] Posted data.
[07:49:53] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~249 kB/s
[07:49:54] - Averaged speed for that direction ~263 kB/s
[07:49:54] - Server reports digital signature does not match.
[07:49:54] (May be due to corruption during network transmission or a corrupted file.)
[07:49:54] - Error: Could not transmit unit 01 (completed February 19) to work server.
[07:49:54] - 36 failed uploads of this unit.
[07:49:54] + Attempting to send results [February 24 07:49:54 UTC]
[07:49:54] - Reading file work/wuresults_01.dat from core
[07:49:54] (Read 20437318 bytes from disk)
[07:49:54] Connecting to http://171.67.108.25:8080/
[07:50:01] Posted data.
[07:50:01] Initial: 0000; + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[07:50:01] (171.67.108.25:8080)
[07:50:01] + Retrying using alternative port
[07:50:01] Connecting to http://171.67.108.25:80/
[07:50:11] Posted data.
[07:50:11] Initial: 0000; + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[07:50:11] (171.67.108.25:80)
[07:50:11] Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[07:50:11] + Sent 0 of 2 completed units to the server
[07:50:11] + Closed connections
[07:50:11]
[07:50:11] + Processing work unit
[07:50:11] Core required: FahCore_a3.exe
[07:50:11] Core found.
[07:50:11] Working on queue slot 09 [February 24 07:50:11 UTC]
[07:50:11] + Working ...
[07:50:11] - Calling './FahCore_a3.exe -dir work/ -nice 19 -suffix 09 -np 2 -checkpoint 10 -forceasm -verbose -lifeline 26151 -version 629'
[07:50:11]
[07:50:11] *------------------------------*
[07:50:11] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
[07:50:11] Version 2.13 (Tue Aug 18 18:28:33 CEST 2009)
[07:50:11]
[07:50:11] Preparing to commence simulation
[07:50:11] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[07:50:11] - Not checking prior termination.
[07:50:11] - Expanded 1768120 -> 1967109 (decompressed 111.2 percent)
[07:50:11] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=1768120 data_size=1967109, decompressed_data_size=1967109 diff=0
[07:50:11] - Digital signature verified
[07:50:11]
[07:50:11] Project: 6023 (Run 0, Clone 126, Gen 25)
[07:50:11]
[07:50:11] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[07:50:11] Entering M.D.
[07:50:17] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0%)
[08:03:33] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1%)
[08:16:48] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2%)
[08:30:01] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3%)
[08:43:16] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps (4%)
[08:56:31] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps (5%)
[09:09:45] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps (6%)
[09:22:59] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps (7%)
[09:36:14] Completed 40000 out of 500000 steps (8%)
[09:49:09] Unit 1's deadline (February 24 07:23) has passed.
[09:49:19] - Autosending finished units... [February 24 09:49:19 UTC]
[09:49:19] Trying to send all finished work units
[09:49:19] Project: 6021 (Run 0, Clone 139, Gen 24)
[09:49:19] + Attempting to send results [February 24 09:49:19 UTC]
[09:49:19] - Reading file work/wuresults_00.dat from core
[09:49:19] (Read 20437313 bytes from disk)
[09:49:19] Connecting to http://171.64.65.54:8080/
[09:49:27] Completed 45000 out of 500000 steps (9%)
[09:50:20] Posted data.
[09:50:20] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~327 kB/s
[09:50:20] - Averaged speed for that direction ~276 kB/s
[09:50:20] - Server reports digital signature does not match.
[09:50:20] (May be due to corruption during network transmission or a corrupted file.)
[09:50:20] - Error: Could not transmit unit 00 (completed February 18) to work server.
[09:50:20] - 49 failed uploads of this unit.
[09:50:20] + Attempting to send results [February 24 09:50:20 UTC]
[09:50:20] - Reading file work/wuresults_00.dat from core
[09:50:20] (Read 20437313 bytes from disk)
[09:50:20] Connecting to http://171.67.108.25:8080/
[09:50:28] Posted data.
[09:50:28] Initial: 0000; + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[09:50:28] (171.67.108.25:8080)
[09:50:28] + Retrying using alternative port
[09:50:28] Connecting to http://171.67.108.25:80/
[09:50:37] Posted data.
[09:50:37] Initial: 0000; + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[09:50:37] (171.67.108.25:80)
[09:50:37] Could not transmit unit 00 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[09:50:37] Project: 6021 (Run 0, Clone 139, Gen 24)
[09:50:37] + Attempting to send results [February 24 09:50:37 UTC]
[09:50:37] - Reading file work/wuresults_00.dat from core
[09:50:37] (Read 20437313 bytes from disk)
[09:50:37] Connecting to http://171.64.65.54:8080/
[09:51:56] Posted data.
[09:51:56] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~252 kB/s
[09:51:56] - Averaged speed for that direction ~271 kB/s
[09:51:56] - Server reports digital signature does not match.
[09:51:56] (May be due to corruption during network transmission or a corrupted file.)
[09:51:56] - Error: Could not transmit unit 00 (completed February 18) to work server.
[09:51:56] - 50 failed uploads of this unit.
[09:51:56] + Attempting to send results [February 24 09:51:56 UTC]
[09:51:56] - Reading file work/wuresults_00.dat from core
[09:51:56] (Read 20437313 bytes from disk)
[09:51:56] Connecting to http://171.67.108.25:8080/
[09:52:04] Posted data.
[09:52:04] Initial: 0000; + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[09:52:04] (171.67.108.25:8080)
[09:52:04] + Retrying using alternative port
[09:52:04] Connecting to http://171.67.108.25:80/
[09:52:13] Posted data.
[09:52:13] Initial: 0000; + Could not connect to Work Server (results)
[09:52:13] (171.67.108.25:80)
[09:52:13] Could not transmit unit 00 to Collection server; keeping in queue.
[09:52:13] + Sent 0 of 2 completed units to the server
[09:52:13] - Autosend completed
[10:02:42] Completed 50000 out of 500000 steps (10%)
[10:15:55] Completed 55000 out of 500000 steps (11%)
[10:29:09] Completed 60000 out of 500000 steps (12%)
[10:42:23] Completed 65000 out of 500000 steps (13%)
[10:55:37] Completed 70000 out of 500000 steps (14%)
[11:08:51] Completed 75000 out of 500000 steps (15%)
[11:22:06] Completed 80000 out of 500000 steps (16%)
[11:35:19] Completed 85000 out of 500000 steps (17%)
[11:48:34] Completed 90000 out of 500000 steps (18%)
[12:01:48] Completed 95000 out of 500000 steps (19%)
[12:15:02] Completed 100000 out of 500000 steps (20%)
[12:28:17] Completed 105000 out of 500000 steps (21%)
[12:41:33] Completed 110000 out of 500000 steps (22%)
[12:54:48] Completed 115000 out of 500000 steps (23%)
[13:08:04] Completed 120000 out of 500000 steps (24%)
[13:21:20] Completed 125000 out of 500000 steps (25%)
[13:34:34] Completed 130000 out of 500000 steps (26%)
[13:47:49] Completed 135000 out of 500000 steps (27%)
[14:01:04] Completed 140000 out of 500000 steps (28%)
[14:14:19] Completed 145000 out of 500000 steps (29%)
[14:27:35] Completed 150000 out of 500000 steps (30%)
[14:40:51] Completed 155000 out of 500000 steps (31%)
[14:54:07] Completed 160000 out of 500000 steps (32%)
[15:07:23] Completed 165000 out of 500000 steps (33%)
[15:20:38] Completed 170000 out of 500000 steps (34%)
[15:33:53] Completed 175000 out of 500000 steps (35%)
[15:47:09] Completed 180000 out of 500000 steps (36%)
[15:52:13] Unit 0's deadline (February 23 09:01) has passed.
[15:52:13] - Autosending finished units... [February 24 15:52:13 UTC]
[15:52:13] Trying to send all finished work units
[15:52:13] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[15:52:13] - Autosend completed
[16:00:26] Completed 185000 out of 500000 steps (37%)
in his sig drfish wrote:Wake me when the Windows SMP client doesn't suck...
drfish wrote:For the general public, I would still hold off since they haven't completely gotten rid of the A2s and A1s yet. However, I do think you should start check it out.Whoa! Blast from the past, thanks for the heads up, I'll check it out and see if I can catch up on everything that has happen since I got fed up and quit.
drfish wrote:Still not much yet unfortunately. We need the Pande Group to get a move on the common OpenCL client.BTW, what kind of PPD can I expect from my shiny new 5870?
drfish wrote:On my PDC E6300 I noticed a couple hundred PPDs more over an A2. However, the biggest change with the new client and A3 seems to be AMD parity. I posted some numbers in another thread so you can refer to the numbers from my X2 250 as well. They are now neck and neck and seems more clock sensitive. So I would say the Q6600 should give you pretty good points. Do a "-smp 3" and fold the GPU and you should get very decent output.Is a Q6600 good for much at all these days?
drfish wrote:These still give good points. GTX260 will be the sweet spot on performance (gaming + Folding), the GTS 240 (9600GT) seems to be the performance (ppd only) per watt per $ king though.8800GT or GTX?
Flying Fox wrote:Yeah, word has it that no matter how powerful the ATI card is they all tend to hit a wall at about 3,000 PPD per GPU.drfish wrote:Still not much yet unfortunately. We need the Pande Group to get a move on the common OpenCL client.BTW, what kind of PPD can I expect from my shiny new 5870?
drfish wrote:With good bonus points for rapid returns I would expect it to make around 2,000 PPD and possibly a good percentage better. The Passkey bonus system seems to be a carrot instead of the stick of very short deadlines. My e4400 @ 2.3GHz is making just under 400 PPD before any bonus. I will track down a bonus point calculator and try to get you a better guesstimate. GJ says the eight process i7s are capable of over 20,000 PPD with the bonus.Is a Q6600 good for much at all these days?
drfish wrote:With good work units the 8800GT should approach 5,000 PPD and the GTX should be in the 5,000 to 6,000 PPD range.8800GT or GTX?
farmpuma wrote:Thanks for the links, Maph.
It seems I was a little overly optimistic about the bonus system for regular a3 work units.
WU 6024 .. 1287 PPD
WU 6050 .. 1284 PPD
With the best a1 work units I was making about 1350 PPD. If the worst a1s are averaged in it still looks like a net gain plus the client improvements are easily worth a slight ding in PPD. And I'm now looking forward to finding the time to build my Xeon 3210 (= C2D Q6300).