Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, JustAnEngineer
Marty_man_X wrote:Hi everybody, it`s me again
The other day me and a couple friends made a bet that it is impossible to build a Potent gaming PC That is capable of running modern games on medium-high settings at a resolution of 1680x1050 for 420$
Flying Fox wrote:May be possible if this is pre-tax and without Windows (add $100 there with the OS).
Can the latest IGP from AMD do 1680x1050 at medium high? That will be the key.
yogibbear wrote:Need to pick a game as the benchmark else any specs are meaningless.
FuturePastNow wrote:Let me guess what you and your friend were doing when you set the budget at $420...
Athlon X3 445 - $75
Some AM3 mobo (probably a 760G) - $60
8GB DDR3 - $58
320GB drive - $50
DVD drive - $20
Case w/ PSU that isn't a no-name brand (cheapest is Cooler Master) - $55
Windows 7 Home Premium - $95
That all comes to $413, with NO graphics card, which is sort of necessary to this endeavor. We need to free up $100, so we have to cut corners.
Cheapest Athlon X2 with a heatsink is $60. 4GB DDR3 is $32. No-name case and PSU is $40. DVD drive is axed. With the same hard drive and Windows, that gets us down to $337, leaving about $80 for a graphics card. That will buy a Geforce GT 440 or a Radeon HD 6570. Either should suffice for most games that aren't Crysis at 1680x1050.
Shipping will put you over budget.
Jigar wrote:The bet is talking about just a gaming PC, so OS can be skipped altogether, just replace the OS with HD4850 or GTX 9800+ and you have a Gaming PC that can hold its own against lot of modern games at 1650X1050 resolution.
Flying Fox wrote:Another potential opportunity for wiggle room is who is building it. If the bet is "you can build a gaming PC for $420" and the "you" is a particular end-user (subject to retail pricing and sales taxes) that's one thing; but if the "you" is the generic one that can include, say, OEMs -- who get volume prices on components and pay nothing close to $100 for Windows -- it's something else again. After all, no end users can assemble their own consoles. (And of course OEMs then charge a premium for a "gaming" PC but that is irrelevant to their costs, just as the at-a-loss price of consoles might be). Now, from the description of the payoff -- somebody gets to keep the resulting PC -- it's pretty clear we're talking about end-users. But -- for me at least -- that's not as interesting as the question of how cheaply you can build a machine that is adequate for playing the most widely-popular games. Much of the potential success of Llano, afterall, turns on whether it's adequate for playing games like WoW at typical (especially laptop) resolutions.I disagree. They are comparing with consoles. If there is no OS how can you play this out of the box? Simply put this requirement is not stated we can't assume anything. Depending on whether we have that $100 room we will see how potent the rig will be.
Marty_man_X wrote:Ok, that is more replys than i expected
to clarify things, there does not have to be an OS, and DX11 is not an absolute must-have, we did not clarify what game, all we said is that it has To be post 2008.
going with llano might be a good idea, just worried that it will have a hard time with any game on this resolution.
Dell wrote:Processor: AMD Athlon II X2 245 (2.9GHz, 2MB)
Genuine Windows 7 Home Premium
Inspiron Desktop 570 MiniTower
500 GB SATA Hard Drive (7200 RPM)
4 GiB DDR3 SDRAM 1333MHz (4 DIMMs)
16X DVD +/- RW Optical Drive
Piano Black
Dell USB Entry Keyboard
Dell 2-Button Mouse
Genuine Windows 7 Home Premium 64-Bit Operating System DVD
wingless wrote:No, it won't play any game at all without an OS. It won't do anything without an OSThis has no OS, but it will play just about any game spectacularly.
EDIT: The pic got cut off. The final price is $406.94, 424.89 shipped. Did the bet include shipping costs?
FuturePastNow wrote:Athlon X3 445 - $75
Some AM3 mobo (probably a 760G) - $60
8GB DDR3 - $58
320GB drive - $50
DVD drive - $20
Case w/ PSU that isn't a no-name brand (cheapest is Cooler Master) - $55
Blazex wrote:That's $15 less than the AMD 870+SB850 +USB3 (BioStar A870U3) motherboard that I suggested and $58 less than the AMD 970+SB950 +USB3 (ASRock 970 Extreme4) motherboard that Wingless suggested, but really, an NVidia chipset? For the same $55, I'd probably lean toward the AMD 770+SB710 (BioStar A770E3) option, if I couldn't scrounge the $15 to get SATA III and USB 3.$50 +5 shipping Gigabyte Micro Atx GA-M68MT-S2P
JustAnEngineer wrote:Blazex wrote:That's $15 less than the AMD 870+SB850 +USB3 (BioStar A870U3) motherboard that I suggested and $58 less than the AMD 970+SB950 +USB3 (ASRock 970 Extreme4) motherboard that Wingless suggested, but really, an NVidia chipset? For the same $55, I'd probably lean toward the AMD 770+SB710 (BioStar A770E3) option, if I couldn't scrounge the $15 to get SATA III and USB 3.$50 +5 shipping Gigabyte Micro Atx GA-M68MT-S2P