Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, farmpuma, just brew it!
internetsandman wrote:Just to be clear, are you wondering if you can use one as a folding card and one for video out? Or are you aiming to be using both for folding and an integrated graphics chip for your video out?
I don't know if either method is possible but if you have the GTX 670 then why not just use that for your folding and video output and ditch the relatively anemic 450?
TDIdriver wrote:yes you can. the GTS 450 produces pretty respectable PPD, on average just a few thousand below the GTX 670.
rogue426 wrote:TDIdriver wrote:yes you can. the GTS 450 produces pretty respectable PPD, on average just a few thousand below the GTX 670.
My assumption is then to put the GTS 450 in the other PCIe slot and manually configure it with FAH client with no external hook up to the card?, i.e . DVI or VGA?
And yes for a $ 125 card the GTS 450 is a good folder , I think the 3 I have average around 10 k a day.
TDIdriver wrote:rogue426 wrote:TDIdriver wrote:yes you can. the GTS 450 produces pretty respectable PPD, on average just a few thousand below the GTX 670.
My assumption is then to put the GTS 450 in the other PCIe slot and manually configure it with FAH client with no external hook up to the card?, i.e . DVI or VGA?
And yes for a $ 125 card the GTS 450 is a good folder , I think the 3 I have average around 10 k a day.
correct. no display hookup necessary.
-edit-
not sure if it'll help but take a look at this guide for your 670