Personal computing discussed

Moderators: renee, Flying Fox, morphine

 
Funkliford
Gerbil In Training
Topic Author
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:45 pm

Why do a lot Pentium M line CPUs lack PAE?

Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:50 pm

Virtually all Intel processors from 1995 - today support except except a bunch of Pentium M processors. Why would they cut it?
 
just brew it!
Administrator
Posts: 54500
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 10:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Why do a lot Pentium M line CPUs lack PAE?

Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:30 pm

Intel has a long history of selectively enabling/disabling specific features to segment their product lineup. This allows them to charge customers who need those features a higher price, without having to design different chips. They have also used 64-bit instruction support and hardware virtualization this way; and their desktop chipsets/CPUs typically don't support ECC DRAM (even though it would be simple to do so - nearly all of AMD's CPUs going back to the original Athlon64 support ECC), to push people who want higher reliability to move to the more expensive Xeon platform.

For a particularly egregious example, see the 486SX and 487SX.

In the case of PAE, it is also possible that the feature simply wasn't ready for the initial Pentium M launch. As customers started to demand the NX bit feature (which requires PAE), they decided to incorporate it into the design.
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
ludi
Lord High Gerbil
Posts: 8646
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 10:47 pm
Location: Sunny Colorado front range

Re: Why do a lot Pentium M line CPUs lack PAE?

Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:59 pm

A cynical man would say they didn't want things like this to become more widespread. The P6-derived Tualatin Pentium III and sub-derivative Pentium M were originally released as stop-gap mobile and SFF solutions after the Pentium 4 failed to scale down to mobile-appropriate power/performance levels.

By the time later Dothan variants were release with the NX-bit enabled, Intel had mostly given up on the "NetBurst" architecture and their roadmaps were already looking forward to the P6-derived "Core" products.
Abacus Model 2.5 | Quad-Row FX with 256 Cherry Red Slider Beads | Applewood Frame | Water Cooling by Brita Filtration
 
Ryu Connor
Global Moderator
Posts: 4369
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Marietta, GA
Contact:

Re: Why do a lot Pentium M line CPUs lack PAE?

Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:59 pm

Only Banias and revisions of Dothan from before Q1 2005 lacked PAE/NX support.

Service Pack 2 for Windows XP introduced DEP (which leverages PAE) in August 25, 2004.

The Pentium M line were intended as laptop only chips. They were vastly superior to the Pentium 4 of the time, in my opinion, but they were not sold on the desktop and did not directly compete against the Pentium 4.

Laptops of that era did not need 36bit memory addressing. My 760 Dothan did support NX and PAE, but the accompanying 915PM chipset maxed out at 2GB of RAM and only had 32bit addressing.

In short the product was never in a market that needed PAE and the hardware ecosystem around the Pentium M didn't support PAE. When a software need arose (DEP) it gained the functionality back.
All of my written content here on TR does not represent or reflect the views of my employer or any reasonable human being. All content and actions are my own.
 
Ryu Connor
Global Moderator
Posts: 4369
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Marietta, GA
Contact:

Re: Why do a lot Pentium M line CPUs lack PAE?

Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:06 pm

ludi wrote:
A cynical man would say they didn't want things like this to become more widespread.


Cynical? No need to doubt that view point. Preventing systems like that were precisely why IMO.
All of my written content here on TR does not represent or reflect the views of my employer or any reasonable human being. All content and actions are my own.
 
Waco
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4850
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Los Alamos, NM

Re: Why do a lot Pentium M line CPUs lack PAE?

Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:56 pm

Probably the same reason my new Cedar Trail laptop with hardware x64 support and DX 10.1 graphics is stuck using 32 bit Windows and DX9 graphics (no drivers, no BIOS support).

Also the same reason Celeron and Pentium CPUs, based on the Sandy Bridge architecture, can't use Smart Response.


Idiotic management, that's what.
Victory requires no explanation. Defeat allows none.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
GZIP: On