An update to the rules

Notices, forum rules, FAQs, and other things of a critical nature.

Moderator: Kevin

An update to the rules

Postposted on Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:36 pm

The rules that govern discussions in the TR forums and comments haven't changed in over four years, but today, we've decided to update them in order to address a growing problem known as stealth viral marketing.

We've had a pretty confident suspicion for quite a while that a subset of the people posting here have alternative motives and agendas, even if you account for the fanboy phenomenon. The "contributions" these folks make to discussions tend to worsen the signal-to-noise ratio of many threads and to distort the priorities expressed in them. If you've sometimes thought certain discussions seem like a weird echo chamber filled with more marketing concerns than traditional PC enthusiast concerns, you know what I'm talking about.

Trouble is, definitively identifying and reining in stealthy viral marketing activity isn't easy. Still, we have decided to take the small step of adding a forum rule explicitly banning it. Here is the text of the new rule:
--
13.) Although we welcome the participation of representatives from industry firms, stealth viral marketing activities are strictly prohibited here. Participants who are employed in the PC hardware industry, either directly or via an arrangement with a third party, must disclose their affiliations up front, either in a public post, a note in their signature, or both. Note that "employed" in this context extends to those who are compensated in the form of product samples, attention, and other means. If you engage in stealth viral marketing activity, you may be banned, and you also immediately forfeit your protection under the TR privacy policy. You have been warned.
--
Our goal is to make clear that TR is not a hospitable place for stealth viral marketing activity.

We are, however, very open to participation from folks in the industry. We're just asking that participants adhere to the standard most good corporate social marketing policies already require: that you actively identify yourself as affiliated with the company you represent.

Also, please note the last part of the rule, where those who engage in stealth viral marketing lose the protections of our privacy policy. (That policy has been updated to reflect this change, as well.) We don't collect much in the way of personally identifiable information—e-mail address, IP addresses, and usernames is the extent of it—but if you engage in stealth viral marketing at TR, we may choose not to afford you the same protection we do everybody else.

In other words, stealth viral marketers may want to close their accounts now, because this rule change is going into effect. Consider this post fair warning.

Let me be clear: we are not going to post the email and IP addresses of obnoxious fanboys or suspected stealth viral marketers as a matter of practice. But if we conduct an investigation and can make a link between you and a viral marketing operation, we are giving ourselves leeway to make the results of that inquiry public.

For the vast majority of you, even the hopeless fanboys, the only effect of this rule update should be better interactions. Our hope is that we can maintain the discussion quality that has been so good here at TR for years. This step is just a small one, but we think it's necessary at this point. Please bear with us as we continue working to maintain the integrity of our community.
Scott Wasson - "Damage"
Editor - The Tech Report
Damage
TR Staff
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 1672
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Lee's Summit, Missouri, USA

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Mon Oct 15, 2012 3:10 pm

I would suggest a minor change for clarification:

Note that "employed" in this context extends to those who are compensated in the form of product samples, attention, and other means.

Would slightly rewritten to:
Note that "employed" in this context extends to those who are compensated in the form of product samples, attention, and other means not just monetarily.

(This should be obvious from the previous sentence, but you will always have those people who want to fudge it.)
I wish to see things not as they are but as they should be.
Aranarth
Gerbil Elite
 
Posts: 602
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:56 am
Location: Big Rapids, Mich. (Est Time Zone)

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:45 pm

Perhaps my brain is just working a bit fuzzily tonight (it's been an especially long Monday) - but to be clear this is directed at marketing personnel only, yes? I write for OCC from time to time but make no mention of it here. I'm not swayed by free product and if there's a fault with something I make it known.
Z68XP-UD4 | 2700K @ 4.4 GHz | 16 GB | 770 | PCP&C Silencer 950 | XSPC RX360 | Heatkiller R3 | D5 + RP-452X2 | HAF 932 | 1 TB WD Black w/ SRT
Waco
Gerbil Elite
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:29 pm

Oh look, Waco, you just did your disclosure, so there's no issue now. ;)
Scott Wasson - "Damage"
Editor - The Tech Report
Damage
TR Staff
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 1672
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Lee's Summit, Missouri, USA

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:44 pm

Damage wrote:Oh look, Waco, you just did your disclosure, so there's no issue now. ;)

I submitted a article once to Heatware.net (as opposed to heatware.com - same owner though)
He was supposed to proof it and post it, and that never happened - so much for my writing career. lol

However, I now feel "disclosed" but telling you this :)
Dposcorp
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Silver subscriber
 
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:12 pm

Damage wrote:Oh look, Waco, you just did your disclosure, so there's no issue now. ;)

:lol:
Z68XP-UD4 | 2700K @ 4.4 GHz | 16 GB | 770 | PCP&C Silencer 950 | XSPC RX360 | Heatkiller R3 | D5 + RP-452X2 | HAF 932 | 1 TB WD Black w/ SRT
Waco
Gerbil Elite
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:14 pm

If this is really all there is to the new rule change then this is a joke. Post in a forum thread that will eventually be buried?
How about requiring them to enter something into the "Occupation" slot in their profile so their marketing affiliations will be displayed below their username in every post they make?
(not directed toward Waco or Dposcorp, I don't think either of you fit into this rule change)
i5-3570K, ASRock Z77 Pro4-m, Asus GTX660 TOP, 120 GB Vertex 3 Max IOPS, 2 TB Samsung EcoGreen F4, 8GB G-Skill @1.25V, Silverstone PS07B
DPete27
Gerbil Jedi
Silver subscriber
 
 
Posts: 1619
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:50 pm
Location: Madison, Wisconsin

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:31 pm

DPete27 wrote:(not directed toward Waco or Dposcorp, I don't think either of you fit into this rule change)

Yeah, after reading it again it doesn't really affect me in the slightest...but I just wanted to make sure. :)
Z68XP-UD4 | 2700K @ 4.4 GHz | 16 GB | 770 | PCP&C Silencer 950 | XSPC RX360 | Heatkiller R3 | D5 + RP-452X2 | HAF 932 | 1 TB WD Black w/ SRT
Waco
Gerbil Elite
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Fri Apr 12, 2013 1:38 pm

I wrote for 2cpu once, but it didn't work out. I'm as biased as they come, and nothing I say can be trusted.
I've been here long enough that I think I can forgo a signature.
Forge
Darth Gerbil
 
Posts: 7959
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: SouthEast PA

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Fri Apr 12, 2013 3:50 pm

Why the necromancy, Forge?
flip-mode
Gerbil Khan
Silver subscriber
 
 
Posts: 9084
Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Cincinnati, OH

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:49 pm

You can ask him, but nothing he says can be trusted.
Scrotos
Graphmaster Gerbil
 
Posts: 1028
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Denver, CO.

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:19 pm

flip-mode wrote:Why the necromancy, Forge?


I realized I'd never declared my previous affiliation. Also, I have never spoken the truth, not even now.
I've been here long enough that I think I can forgo a signature.
Forge
Darth Gerbil
 
Posts: 7959
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: SouthEast PA

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Fri Apr 12, 2013 10:18 pm

Forge wrote:
flip-mode wrote:Why the necromancy, Forge?


I realized I'd never declared my previous affiliation. Also, I have never spoken the truth, not even now.


PUI? :)
SecretSquirrel
Gerbil Jedi
Gold subscriber
 
 
Posts: 1686
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: The Colony, TX (Dallas suburb)

Re: An update to the rules

Postposted on Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:42 am

SecretSquirrel wrote:
Forge wrote:
flip-mode wrote:Why the necromancy, Forge?


I realized I'd never declared my previous affiliation. Also, I have never spoken the truth, not even now.


PUI? :)

I don't need chemical motivation to achieve altered states. I've just shut down the logical parts of my brain for unscheduled maintenance this weekend.
I've been here long enough that I think I can forgo a signature.
Forge
Darth Gerbil
 
Posts: 7959
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: SouthEast PA


Return to Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests