Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, Dposcorp, SpotTheCat
JustAnEngineer wrote:The G15 has a higher-resolution display, a larger aperture and a larger sensor. The G15 is also 1.5 times as heavy.
TheEmrys wrote:I'd personally look at a RX-100. 20 MP, Zeiss lens, f1.8-4.9. 28-100mm. Built in image stabilization.
Here is a pretty good dpreview that compares it to the.. comps. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-cybershot-dsc-rx100
Either that or I'd look at a mirrorless with a superzoom.
I think you will regret not taking your dslr with a bigger lens.
TheEmrys wrote:I think you will regret not taking your dslr with a bigger lens.
cynan wrote:TheEmrys wrote:I'd personally look at a RX-100. 20 MP, Zeiss lens, f1.8-4.9. 28-100mm. Built in image stabilization.
Here is a pretty good dpreview that compares it to the.. comps. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-cybershot-dsc-rx100
Either that or I'd look at a mirrorless with a superzoom.
I think you will regret not taking your dslr with a bigger lens.
If you're going to look in the price range of the RX100, the Fujifilm x20 is worth a look. Sure, it doesn't have as large a sensor as the RX100, which is its standout feature, but has a great lens, Fujifilm's new x-trans CMOS sensor that some people just love the detail and colors of. Plus it has better ergonomics and manual controls than the RX100 without being significantly larger. It's also the only pocket sized cam that has an optical viewfinder with digital overlay of exposure information (which will come in useful when taking pics outside on bright sunny days - especially when shooting in manual). And I thinks its about 10% cheaper on average. For low light and video shooting, the RX100 has an edge (though the X20 can do 1080p at 60 FPS, it does not allow manual aperture control like the RX100). For everything else, the Fujifilm X20 is probably the winner. Because of the RX100s large sensor, you also don't get as wide an angle when zoomed out, which might get in the way of shooting those African landscapes...
I also agree that when getting into the $600 range, micro interchangeable lens systems begin to look appealing, if you think this might be something you'll be interested in spending more money in later.
rogthewookiee wrote:Can anyone help me make a final choice between the G15 and the SX260
I'm spending next year living in Kenya and I can see wanting the 20x zoom. However, i'm a bit spoiled as my normal camera is a 5D and all L glass. Once apon a time I did have a Canon SD1000. I'm packing to fit in a hiking backpack so the big gear needs to stay behind. much to my horror.
I know the G15 is aimed at serious photographers, but I don't want to default to it. I'm strongly leaning towards it though, shooting in RAW, larger aperture and sensor are hard to ignore!
or maybe I should look at something else?
Flying Fox wrote:(using the X10 as comparison) I am not sure how "pocketable" it can be. Usually "ergonomic" means a larger footprint because the human hand is not boxy. But yes, the extra manual controls can be nice and cheaper is always good (the RX100 has remained at ~$650 here in US).
JohnC wrote:What will you be doing in Kenya? Instead of very expensive, low-zoom cameras you might consider something cheaper
rogthewookiee wrote:I know that people keep raving about the rx100, but it is still a though sell for me. It is ~$200 more than the g15 and square in u4/3 range. Sure the u4/3 are not as pocket friendly, but they are infinitely smaller to the gear I'm accustomed to hauling around!
vargis14 wrote:Out of the 2 you posted i would go with the cheaper PowerShot SX260 since it has 3x more zoom its more compact, cheaper by a lot.
Then i would use the money saved for a extra batteries and or Fat memory cards.
I am sure any problem photos you really like could be enhanced/fixed by photoshop or whatever you use to process your favorite pictures.
rogthewookiee wrote:Can anyone help me make a final choice between the G15 and the SX260
I'm spending next year living in Kenya and I can see wanting the 20x zoom. However, i'm a bit spoiled as my normal camera is a 5D and all L glass. Once apon a time I did have a Canon SD1000. I'm packing to fit in a hiking backpack so the big gear needs to stay behind. much to my horror.
I know the G15 is aimed at serious photographers, but I don't want to default to it. I'm strongly leaning towards it though, shooting in RAW, larger aperture and sensor are hard to ignore!
or maybe I should look at something else?
TheEmrys wrote:Too bad you are on Nikon, or I'd tell you to find a Minolta AF500. 500mm lens for under $500. Fits in a big pocket, too. Wow. To me, the chance at wildlife photography would be just a killer. So jealous.
Airmantharp wrote:Of course the hard part with one of these when using an adapter is that the lens will still be huge- there's no hiding L glass.
rogthewookiee wrote:If it comes down to it, i'm sure I can get a cheap replacement camera locally. I'd like to start out assuming i'll be safe and careful with my gear!
wintermane666 wrote:Never ever go anywhere like that with just one camera so get the cheaper one it also happens to have the better zoom and that's very important as a lot of what you want to take pics of you DONT want to be close to;/
Then get a cheaper camera as a backup.
rogthewookiee wrote:Can anyone help me make a final choice between the G15 and the SX260
I'm spending next year living in Kenya and I can see wanting the 20x zoom. However, i'm a bit spoiled as my normal camera is a 5D and all L glass. Once apon a time I did have a Canon SD1000. I'm packing to fit in a hiking backpack so the big gear needs to stay behind. much to my horror.
I know the G15 is aimed at serious photographers, but I don't want to default to it. I'm strongly leaning towards it though, shooting in RAW, larger aperture and sensor are hard to ignore!
or maybe I should look at something else?
danny e. wrote:rogthewookiee wrote:Can anyone help me make a final choice between the G15 and the SX260
I'm spending next year living in Kenya and I can see wanting the 20x zoom. However, i'm a bit spoiled as my normal camera is a 5D and all L glass. Once apon a time I did have a Canon SD1000. I'm packing to fit in a hiking backpack so the big gear needs to stay behind. much to my horror.
I know the G15 is aimed at serious photographers, but I don't want to default to it. I'm strongly leaning towards it though, shooting in RAW, larger aperture and sensor are hard to ignore!
or maybe I should look at something else?
I bought my first point & shoot camera in almost 10 years.. the Nikon P510. Great little camera!
I recommend it.
Captain Ned wrote:When it comes to cameras, the pictures you can take with the camera at hand will be long-term memories. The pictures you couldn't take because you were futzing with the camera settings will never be seen. Take due notice and govern yourself accordingly.
TheEmrys wrote:Captain Ned wrote:When it comes to cameras, the pictures you can take with the camera at hand will be long-term memories. The pictures you couldn't take because you were futzing with the camera settings will never be seen. Take due notice and govern yourself accordingly.
While I agree with this in general application, I think for anyone with a dslr background, this won't be the hindrance it could be for the average user. For myself, I'd would soon risk the missed shot than the constant frustration of a lack of adjustments.
The more I think about it, the more I think the OP should bring their dslr with a good walkaround lens and something that reaches up to 300mm and call it good. Maybe a teleconverter, too.