Personal computing discussed
wintermane666 wrote:Does that make Scott THE stutterer? Or lord of stutter? The stutter king?
Ryu Connor wrote:Personally I don't find that article all that flattering to Damage.
Ryu Connor wrote:Personally I don't find that article all that flattering to Damage.
It seems like a multi-page rehash of Ryan's distaste for FRAPS.
Captain Ned wrote:Ryu Connor wrote:Personally I don't find that article all that flattering to Damage.
It seems like a multi-page rehash of Ryan's distaste for FRAPS.
Even Scott is on record as wanting a better tool than FRAPS.
Arclight wrote:wintermane666 wrote:Does that make Scott THE stutterer? Or lord of stutter? The stutter king?
Smoothness tyrant?
tanker27 wrote:Its slowly getting out there. We should dub the 'micro stutter' The Scott Wasson Effect.
mi1stormilst wrote:we are without the sold work of The Tech Report.
Flying Fox wrote:tanker27 wrote:Its slowly getting out there. We should dub the 'micro stutter' The Scott Wasson Effect.
I thought we don't want to use the term "micro stutter" because it is not to be confused with the SLI/CF-induced slowdowns?
MadManOriginal wrote:It's surely an interesting technical article, but yeah it comes off to me as 'AMD and NV don't like FRAPS and it has limitations show frame times so we won't use it (and oh btw, that also means we don't have to update our now outmoded GPU testing methods yet)'
drfish wrote:Reading the PCPER take on it is more enlightening. Wonder if TR is in the loop...
drfish wrote:
Firestarter wrote:Depends on what you call 'in the loop'.