20 nm silicon fab process
4096 stream processors
16 serial processor cores
4 geometry engines
256 TMUs
64 ROPs
512-bit GDDR5 memory interface
Reference - Link
Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, morphine, SecretSquirrel
chuckula wrote:That's not their answer to the GeForce 700. That's their next-generation product that won't be seeing the light of day until well into 2014, which is right around the time that Nvidia will have its own next-generation products. The GeForce 700 is really just a reshuffled version of Kepler anyway.
Jigar wrote:20 nm silicon fab process
4096 stream processors
16 serial processor cores
4 geometry engines
256 TMUs
64 ROPs
512-bit GDDR5 memory interface
Reference - Link
Jigar wrote:20 nm silicon fab process
4096 stream processors
16 serial processor cores
4 geometry engines
256 TMUs
64 ROPs
512-bit GDDR5 memory interface
Reference - Link
Jigar wrote:chuckula wrote:That's not their answer to the GeForce 700. That's their next-generation product that won't be seeing the light of day until well into 2014, which is right around the time that Nvidia will have its own next-generation products. The GeForce 700 is really just a reshuffled version of Kepler anyway.
I highly doubt next generation Nvidia products are inbound in the first quarter of 2014.
flip-mode wrote:20 nm silicon fab process
(Volcanic islands) 4096 stream processors Vs 2880 (Titan)
16 serial processor cores Vs NA (TItan)
4 geometry engines
256 TMUs
64 ROPs Vs 48 (Titan)
512-bit GDDR5 memory interface Vs 384 bit GDDR5 (Titan)
That sounds about as strong as Nvidia's Titan, which you can purchase this very day.
Jigar wrote:flip-mode wrote:It looks more powerful than Titan, infact if you look closely 20nm Silicon fab process should help the GPU frequency scaling.That sounds about as strong as Nvidia's Titan, which you can purchase this very day.
flip-mode wrote:Jigar wrote:flip-mode wrote:It looks more powerful than Titan, infact if you look closely 20nm Silicon fab process should help the GPU frequency scaling.That sounds about as strong as Nvidia's Titan, which you can purchase this very day.
So in 2014 there will be a Radeon that will be slightly faster by virtue of clock rate than a card Nvidia has on the market right now, at least a year earlier. Um, I don't see cause for jubilation here.
chuckula wrote:If it's substantially cheaper, then that's a very good thing. Although you are right that it won't be miraculous from a purely performance-based perspective.
flip-mode wrote:Jigar wrote:flip-mode wrote:It looks more powerful than Titan, infact if you look closely 20nm Silicon fab process should help the GPU frequency scaling.That sounds about as strong as Nvidia's Titan, which you can purchase this very day.
So in 2014 there will be a Radeon that will be slightly faster by virtue of clock rate than a card Nvidia has on the market right now, at least a year earlier. Um, I don't see cause for jubilation here.
Jigar wrote:We both are speculating here, if the architecture is efficient, even 100 steam processor based Radeon can beat Titan. All i did here was passed on the information that was published on techpowerup.
flip-mode wrote:Jigar wrote:We both are speculating here, if the architecture is efficient, even 100 steam processor based Radeon can beat Titan. All i did here was passed on the information that was published on techpowerup.
Yeah, I know. I was being a tad bitchy, in part because AMD is more often than not really good at promises and really bad at delivery.