Airmantharp wrote:JohnC wrote:Terra_Nocuus wrote:any SLI
Personally I would stay away from any multi-GPU solution, regardless of the GPU manufacturer. With a single GPU you don't have to wait indefinite amount of time for SLI/CrossFire profiles with good scaling or for other fixes for potential issues caused by SLI/Crossfire.
Terra_Nocuus wrote:What about USB Wifi adapters? Are those decent nowadays
No.
Terra_Nocuus wrote:
I have that, it's a pretty good card, works well with my current router (Asus RT-N66U). It supports both 802.11n bands and doesn't have a useless 802.11ac support.
How did you get so negative?
I mean, really- there doesn't have to be a difference between USB and PCIe based WiFi adapters- sure, there's been plenty of crappy USB ones, but I assure you that there's been plenty of crappy PCIe ones too. The only ones that I truly consider solid are the mPCIe cards Intel makes, and they don't even making a 3x3 802.11ac adapter yet.
And how the hell is 802.11ac useless? At the very least, it guarantees a 2x2:2 solution (two channels on 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz). And it uses a different kind of modulation than 802.11b/g/n, similar to what LTE uses. It works very well if you have a good 802.11ac router, which I read as implied in the OP, though I could be wrong. Still, if the OP is interested in .ac, then why would you counter that?
And I do have that TP-Link card- with an external triple-mast antenna purchased separately, and it does work great, though I'm not currently using it at my new place since the router is now next to my desktop. I also have a TP-Link 802.11n router that worked wonders too, but somehow ATT's router is more than functional for now. I'll plug the TP-Link router in when I start trying to load Lightroom Catalogs remotely (and consider an upgrade to 802.11ac across the board if needed...).
As for SLI- well, at least lately, Nvidia has substantially upped their game, while AMD has been found to essentially be non-participating, and the jury's still out on them. So we'll see after this next round of cards hits. But if one were to buy today, a pair of GTX770 4GB cards would likely be the best price/performance bid, easily outperforming any single-GPU solution on the market, none of which are actually fast enough for 1440p/1600p.
I'm not negative, I am just a realist.
USB-based WiFi adapters tend to dissipate heat worse than PCIe cards (especially if they have plastic cover), leading to shorter lifespan. They are also more prone to be affected by USB port-related issues (compatibility with certain chipsets, lack of necessary power for USB-powered models, etc). I've dealt with several of them (for my personal use and with the ones purchased by other people), NONE of them provided a stable enough connection and lasted more than several months. And yes, I know that PCIe adapters can also have issues, I went through several of them (last one being a crappy Realtek-based Rosewill-branded POS), however it is easier to find a working model with PCIe cards.
802.11ac is useless because it does nothing useful in terms of range extension (2.4GHz 802.11n will still give a better range) and the current 802.11n standards provide enough bandwidth for any broadband connection, so unless you must transfer large amount of data between your WiFi devices there is no need to waste money for it.
As for SLI - it doesn't matter if it performs better than AMD's, I wasn't comparing them. What matters is that I see driver release notes and in them I see the SLI profiles being added or updated some time after the many major game releases. Some games take shorter time, some longer. If you want to play this waiting game - you are free to do it but personally I am not willing to do that and I would not recommend anyone else to do that. That's all I was saying.
Gifter of Nvidia Titans and countless Twitch donation extraordinaire, nothing makes me more happy in life than randomly helping random people