Sisoft Software wrote:Q: The benchmark scores in the latest Sandra are different from earlier versions!
A: The benchmarks change from major release to major release in order to keep up with new technology developments. Please compare results using the same major version of Sandra.
JdL wrote:I think we need to dig a little deeper into your spec.
First off, can you give exact specs of the RAM modules, including current CAS latencies and DIMM configuration? It may be possible that your latencies are abnormally high, and / or that you are not actually running in dual-channel mode either due to a BIOS setting or an improper DIMM configuration.
Rza79 wrote:I'm still awaiting some Sandra results you guys might want to share.
Rza79 wrote:It was hard to find Sandra 2009 but here are the results:
If I compare my results with Techspot's i7 965 then I'm perfectly lineair in line with their results. Basically a perfect match.
What does this mean? Sandra 2014 runs a wrong codebase on my system? Are the samples in Sandra 2014 not right?
I need to do some more testing tomorrow. Bedtime now.
Rza79 wrote:It seems nobody cares anymore about the mighty LGA1366 platform.
tanker27 wrote:Rza79 wrote:It seems nobody cares anymore about the mighty LGA1366 platform.
Sad but true. My i7 920 is nothing more than a file server.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Starfalcon and 0 guests