Personal computing discussed

Moderators: renee, SecretSquirrel, notfred

 
Elohim
Gerbil First Class
Topic Author
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:32 pm
Location: Wisconsin, United States of America

I Need a slimmed down Linux or an older version.

Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:29 am

Hey everyone,

I've got an old computer, an HP Pavilion PC Model 8543C, with the following specs:

Celeron 466Mhz
128MB of RAM (2 64MB sticks) of the PC100 variety
1 8 GB Hard Drive
1 10 GB Hard Drive
1 CD-ROM
1 CD-ROM Burner
3.5 Floppy
Fax Modem
Integrated Video Intel 810 (11 MB shared system memory)
AMC97 codec - audio

I have the strange notion of wanting to put a Linux distribution of some sort on this ancient little guy, but the most current distributions of Ubuntu at least require a bit more umph. Could someone reccomend a light Linux distrubution or an older distribution that may run on this machine decently? I could in theory upgrade the RAM to 256MB by buying something on Ebay for a couple bucks.

Any comments are welcome, thanks!
Last edited by Elohim on Tue Sep 04, 2007 11:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
Usacomp2k3
Gerbil God
Posts: 23043
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 4:53 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:50 am

I have a similary system that I put Xubuntu on. Supposedly Xfce is a much more lightweight frontend than Gnome, and in practice it runs pretty well on hardware almost the exact same as yours (this is an old Dell).
 
titan
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Posts: 3376
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Great Smoky Mountains
Contact:

Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:50 am

Depends on what you want to do with it. Gentoo has been pretty snappy on my PII 233MHz PC. Right now, it's only a file server, but it was my main desktop for a while and I had Blackbox as my window manager. I think I installed XFCE at one point too. Anyway, it all ran pretty well.
The best things in life are free.
http://www.gentoo.org
Guy 1: Surely, you will fold with me.
Guy 2: Alright, but don't call me Shirley.
 
Heiwashin
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4815
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 1:21 pm
Location: Denham Springs, LA

Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:52 am

Well, haven't looked at the specs much but xubuntu is meant to be a much lighter ubuntu. with near same functionality. The only thing is you may have to use text based installation which i've had trouble with being as it likes to connect to the net and get information. If your just using ethernet that shouldn't be a problem though(it picked the wrong wep encryption and hung up at the downloading point)
Looking for Knowledge wrote:
When drunk.....
I want to have sex, but find I am more likely to be shot down than when I am sober.
 
Usacomp2k3
Gerbil God
Posts: 23043
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 4:53 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:57 am

Heiwashin wrote:
Well, haven't looked at the specs much but xubuntu is meant to be a much lighter ubuntu. with near same functionality. The only thing is you may have to use text based installation which i've had trouble with being as it likes to connect to the net and get information. If your just using ethernet that shouldn't be a problem though(it picked the wrong wep encryption and hung up at the downloading point)

What I did was actually install Ubuntu, then after the fact switch it to Xfce. That was fairly painless, and the installer for the full-fledged Ubuntu is fairly painless.

Plus, going that way always gives you the option of booting into gnome if you want to 8)

http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/xubuntu
 
Heiwashin
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4815
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 1:21 pm
Location: Denham Springs, LA

Tue Sep 04, 2007 11:04 am

Usacomp2k3 wrote:
Heiwashin wrote:
Well, haven't looked at the specs much but xubuntu is meant to be a much lighter ubuntu. with near same functionality. The only thing is you may have to use text based installation which i've had trouble with being as it likes to connect to the net and get information. If your just using ethernet that shouldn't be a problem though(it picked the wrong wep encryption and hung up at the downloading point)

What I did was actually install Ubuntu, then after the fact switch it to Xfce. That was fairly painless, and the installer for the full-fledged Ubuntu is fairly painless.

Plus, going that way always gives you the option of booting into gnome if you want to 8)

http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/xubuntu


Nice, good pointer.
Looking for Knowledge wrote:
When drunk.....
I want to have sex, but find I am more likely to be shot down than when I am sober.
 
Elohim
Gerbil First Class
Topic Author
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:32 pm
Location: Wisconsin, United States of America

What driver issues can I expect?

Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:00 pm

Hey, while I've got this question out there let me add another. Based on the system specs I gave I'd like to pick everyone's brain about what driver issues I may encounter using xUbuntu with this system. I do have a generic PCI networking card in their too, but I'll have to take it out and blow the dust off to get the make and model :).
 
titan
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Posts: 3376
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Great Smoky Mountains
Contact:

Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:07 pm

You shouldn't encounter any driver problems. Your computer is fairly old, so the d4rivers should be working for your computer right off the bat.
The best things in life are free.
http://www.gentoo.org
Guy 1: Surely, you will fold with me.
Guy 2: Alright, but don't call me Shirley.
 
notfred
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4610
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 10:10 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:08 pm

The network card is almost guaranteed to work, Linux has trouble with newer stuff where the drivers haven't been written yet but anything that old should have a driver. The fax/modem is probably a Winmodem and so may not do so well. If you can bump the memory it will help the performance, but everything else should just work straight out of the box.
 
CheetoPet
Gerbil In Training
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 10:45 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Wed Sep 05, 2007 1:54 am

When you are talking specs like this a major part of your desktop performance is going to be dependent on hardware acceleration working as well as possible. 11 megs should be sufficient for solid 2d, make sure to use the latest 2.1.1 intel xorg driver & read the man page as ubuntu doesn't do much graphics configuration beyond the basics.

FWIW, I've recently had firefox running more or less ok on a 233Mhz iMac G3 with 64MB, 6MB Mach 64. Slow but usable.
 
bthylafh
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4320
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 11:55 pm
Location: Southwest Missouri, USA

Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:52 pm

On the OP's HP, I wouldn't go with Xubuntu. I've put that on a K6-2/500 with 512 MB of RAM, and it's pretty slow. Given my experiences, I'd say that it's more CPU limited, or possibly VGA-limited (some old Trident 9750).

With that box, I'd put in Damn Small Linux or Puppy Linux. With DSL I was able to run Firefox acceptably on a Pentium-90 with 64MB of RAM and a Voodoo3 (took about 30 sec to start FF, though). If you're fairly experienced with Linux, you might try Debian Netinst (net install), which will let you choose exactly which packages you want.

All of the hardware you mentioned should work except for the modem. If the modem's a Winmodem, it's very unlikely it will work; however, a hardware modem is a cinch.
Hakkaa päälle!
i7-8700K|Asus Z-370 Pro|32GB DDR4|Asus Radeon RX-580|Samsung 960 EVO 1TB|1988 Model M||Logitech MX 518 & F310|Samsung C24FG70|Dell 2209WA|ATH-M50x
 
Skid
Gerbil
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:42 pm

Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:34 pm

Perhaps VectorLinux?

I've used VL (the non-SOHO version) successfully on machines far less powerful than the one listed. One was a 200Mhz Pentium Classic with 64MB RAM.

The trick is to keep away from the "heavier" desktop enviroments like KDE and Gnome. Try distros that offer IceWM/IceWM Light or Xfce.

Skid
 
just brew it!
Administrator
Posts: 54500
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 10:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:04 pm

Any way you can bump the RAM to at least 256MB? That would probably widen the field of potential distros a bit.

From personal experience, Redhat 8 actually ran reasonably well on a 500MHz K6-III, but you probably want something a bit more current than that.
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
nightmorph
Gerbil First Class
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 2:36 pm

Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 pm

--
Last edited by nightmorph on Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
bitvector
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Posts: 3293
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:39 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:43 pm

You could try some specialized "light" distro, but I'd just put a base Debian or Ubuntu system (for Ubuntu, that means installing the Alternate Install CD and not selecting the "Desktop" stuff when it runs tasksel) and then install what you want on top as needed. It'll be easier to deal with that way than trying to use some oddball cut down distro. A 466Mhz processor with 128MB of RAM isn't all that bad. I look back to running Linux with X11 on 486s and my basic window manager configuration and background apps aren't all that different (the apps are a bit more memory hungry, though -- Firefox versus old, ugly Motif Netscape).

When I want to do a fairly lightweight system, I ditch the desktop environment entirely -- not even XFCE, just X and a window manager. Hell, I never install desktop environments on any of my systems, even without resource constraints. I'd put X on there and fluxbox (or wmaker or icewm -- that's a matter personal taste). Then you can install Opera (to me it seems to run better in memory limited situations than Firefox -- use the official package repos provided by Opera) and it won't be too bad. Maybe add gkrellm or some kind of wmaker dock apps, and you're good to go.
 
ubiloo
Gerbil In Training
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 4:25 am

Slackware + XFCE

Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:51 am

I think this is a viable solution.
Forget KDE and Gnome with 128M. Go XFCE.
Slackware is usually light in terms of hard disk space requirements if you just install the basics.
By the way, it is not the friendliest distribution but still my favourite
 
tesmar
Graphmaster Gerbil
Posts: 1075
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:18 pm

Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:35 am

just brew it! wrote:
Any way you can bump the RAM to at least 256MB? That would probably widen the field of potential distros a bit.

From personal experience, Redhat 8 actually ran reasonably well on a 500MHz K6-III, but you probably want something a bit more current than that.


Redhat 9 might work well, too. Just have to update some core packages and you ar egood to go.
The world is indeed full of peril. But there is much that is fair. And though in all lands love is mingled with grief, it grows the greater. J. R. R. Tolkien
 
Corith
Gerbil
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:32 am

Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:39 am

I've always been a fan of Slackware for slimmed down systems. Not a lot of auto-updates and a mean install interface to use, but atleast you know everything you put on your system.
 
[SDG]Mantis
Gerbil XP
Posts: 351
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 5:39 am

Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:58 am

Corith wrote:
I've always been a fan of Slackware for slimmed down systems. Not a lot of auto-updates and a mean install interface to use, but atleast you know everything you put on your system.


Good for a slim installation...but quite a learning curve unless you are pretty familiar with Linux or Unix systems.

I think that the Xubuntu suggestion is a good one. If you run into problems with using the distribution or with responsiveness, then look for something lighter.

BTW, I don't think that the GUI installer of Ubuntu will complete with those system specs. I'd use the alternate installer distribution. The installer isn't as pretty, but it is much lighter and kinder to older hardware.

Really lightweight distros include:
Feather Linux http://featherlinux.berlios.de/
and
Damn Small Linux http://damnsmalllinux.org/

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
GZIP: On