mattsteg wrote:It might be more clear but it's still not accurate.
I am talking about the Players being unionized. Ugh, miscommunication of the year?
Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, Captain Ned
ifittakesforever wrote:Hmm, no Sammy Sosa, which isn't all that surprising to me since there's never been any hint of a paper trail with him, just guilt by association.
chasscF1 wrote:I don't see the purpose of all of this. Outting a few players, many based on heresay. No one believes that a ton of players in MLB were not on steroids in the 90s and early 2000s. A more meaningful way to appeal to fans might be actually fighting the Union to get independent testers that draw and store blood samples. Players who are mentioned without physical evidence to support the claims will have a field day with this. Bud Selig has created an even bigger headache for himself for no reason.
tanker27 wrote:chasscF1 wrote:I don't see the purpose of all of this. Outting a few players, many based on heresay. No one believes that a ton of players in MLB were not on steroids in the 90s and early 2000s. A more meaningful way to appeal to fans might be actually fighting the Union to get independent testers that draw and store blood samples. Players who are mentioned without physical evidence to support the claims will have a field day with this. Bud Selig has created an even bigger headache for himself for no reason.
Heresay?
Read the report.....they have full time lines of these guys. In fact the most damning thing is they have the canceled checks that the players wrote to buy the stuff. Yes this pics are in the report!
ifittakesforever wrote:Hmm, no Sammy Sosa, which isn't all that surprising to me since there's never been any hint of a paper trail with him, just guilt by association.
"If you're going to put these guys that supposedly did steroids into the Hall of Fame, I mean I've got to get a shot somewhere," he said.
derFunkenstein wrote:Man, this is so bad even Pete Rose can slam a guy and I'm thinking...hey, this kinda makes sense...
link"If you're going to put these guys that supposedly did steroids into the Hall of Fame, I mean I've got to get a shot somewhere," he said.
To the best of my knowledge, all Pete Rose did was bet on the Reds to win. I don't see how his gambling is bad enough to keep him out this long yet some of these guys still today get writers saying "sure, I'd still vote for him" (Tim Kirkjian on ESPN said that about Clemens, and at least represents himself as someone who gets a Hall of Fame ballot).