http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/b ... ml?cnn=yes
What next.... drug tests????
Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, Captain Ned
Hawkwing74 wrote:I like limited video replay in all sports. Once in a while, I've wished the NBA had it too.
Hawkwing74 wrote:I like limited video replay in all sports. Once in a while, I've wished the NBA had it too.
Hawkwing74 wrote:They do? For what types of calls? I haven't watched it much in recent years.
In the NBA version, there are four, and only four, triggers for the replay system. Replay cannot be initiated by a coach -- no "challenge" system here -- or even by the officials themselves. The triggers are automatic, and unambiguous:
*A made basket at the end of the first, second or third quarters, with no time remaining -- 0:00 -- on the clock.
*A made basket at the end of the fourth quarter or overtime with no time remaining -- 0:00 -- on the clock that could affect the outcome of the game. In other words, a basket that ties or wins the game for one team. If the score is 100-90, a made basket at 0:00 will not be reviewable.
*A foul called at the end of the first, second or third quarters, with no time remaining -- 0:00 -- on the clock.
*A foul called at the end of the fourth quarter or overtime with no time remaining -- 0:00 -- on the clock for which the resulting free throws could affect the outcome of the game. In other words, the team committing the foul has to be in the penalty, or get in the penalty with the foul, or the player who is fouled has to be in the act of shooting. But again, if the score is 100-90, the foul will not be reviewed.
Usacomp2k3 wrote:Yeah. Derfunk's idea goes way too far IMO. Giving the managers challenges just gives managers more opportunity for gamesmanship, throwing off the rhythm of pitchers or whatever.From what I've heard, it sounds like a good implementation. Only usable for boundary calls.