b3n113 wrote:I support the site by using the newegg click throughs, I fold for the team like crazy. I don't steal and I'm not aware of such rules? If I chose to opt out of viewing the spam when I don't have the cash flow to purchase something thats one thing.
However, if you're saying that you are defiantly going to lose revenue due to me not allowing those adverts to load I'll stop blocking them right now.
Damage wrote:Posts recommending ad-blocking software will be deleted.
Kevin wrote:Damage wrote:Posts recommending ad-blocking software will be deleted.
To go along with this, I've added a new forum rule regarding this issue. Please read the new rule #12 (#11 was also added a month ago if you haven't checked the rules recently).
So when it comes to the forums or comments, ad-blocking (not pop-ups) is now treated like warez.
Ragnar Dan wrote:Though some could be overzealous in enforcement, such as if someone mentions the existence of such software and their posting was edited or deleted.
kvndoom wrote:Curiously, what is the advantage of flash over the .gif format for ads? I just wonder why advertisers push flash ads so much more these days.
Users browsing this forum: absurdity, Bing [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 9 guests