21 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #19. Posted at 11:14 AM on Oct 18th 2006, Edited at 11:15 AM on Oct 18th 2006 Edit   Reply

Just wondering, can any current 965 mobo's do 1333Mhz FSB? Or are they all topping out at 1066Mhz atm ?
collapse

   #18. Posted at 05:51 AM on Oct 18th 2006, Edited at 05:53 AM on Oct 18th 2006 Edit   Reply

I like the naming scheme of the bearlake chipsets. Instead fo following the usual marketing trend around the techworld. They now removed a number. So its like P35, Q35, Q33. Instead of maybe P1035 etc.

Else nice to see the FSB refresh for the 65nm line aswell. Tho is basicly just the same as woodcrests.
collapse

   #5. Posted at 05:38 PM on Oct 17th 2006, Edited at 05:38 PM on Oct 17th 2006 Edit   Reply

#3, you just said that there is a chance that there is a chance that it will be good for overclocking. I disagree. Lower FSBs with higher mutipliers typically is the best for overclocking when success is defined as how high the core clock speed can go.
collapse

   #14. Posted at 12:17 AM on Oct 18th 2006 Edit   Reply

that 6800 will be highly sought after by enthusiasts due to the lower fsb
collapse

   #1. Posted at 04:43 PM on Oct 17th 2006 Edit   Reply

lower multipliers... could end up being worse for overclocking
collapse
21 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q