![]()
| #1. Posted at 12:19 PM on Jan 4th 2007 | Edit Reply |
|
Shintai |
150$ more for the QX6700..thats a nobrainer. Not really worth buying before Q2, cept perhaps for its alot lower TDP.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
AbRASiON |
I personally have become sick of the rat race - sad place to admit it I know, since I still love hardware.
I don't think I'll ever ever pay more than 200$ US for a CPU again and frankly I'm hoping to keep it under 100$ It's amazing what a smart budget buyer can get at a low price if you have patience and are happy to play the latest games only 6 months after their release instead of 6 hours... |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Forge |
I could maybe justify a 500$ CPU, especially if the Q6600 specs are right and it OCs anything close to the e6600, but 850$ is way too much. I'd love to skip right over C2D and go straight to C2Q, but price is a sensitive area.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
moose17145 |
Both are overpriced. They need to release a quad core for around 300~400 price bracket imo. The 2nd quarter price looks more reasonable than release price, but still too expensive to see wide spread adoption... but you know what they say about small steps and all that...
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
droopy1592 |
This 3800x2 is going to last me for a good long time. With a lot of RAM, i don't see the need for quad cores. Not with Vista/XP or anything that i use/will use.
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |