I think it's telling that the 6000+ is a Windsor (90nm part).

Yet another sign that AMD are having trouble with the 65 nm node*.

* Although I'd prefer a 90nm X2 to the 65nm version anyway.

Have these been reviewed anywhere?

Anandtech has a test on it up at the moment.It does pretty well against the E6600 but considering its $150 more it cant be considered much of a threat.

From the Xbit and FiringSquad reviews I've alread read, it seems like the 6000+ should be priced below the E6600 at $300. (roughly equal performance, on average, but at almost twice the power consumption) And with the expected next round of Intel pricecuts, this highest-end Athlon should be in the $200~250 range.

AMD's current situation almost feels like Intel during Netburst's last legs. Ugly, thy name is AMD.