Comments for: New OCZ RAM is 'tailored' for Socket AM2 chips

#3. Posted at 09:55 AM on May 8th 2007, Edited at 02:16 PM on May 8th 2007

Edit Reply

Shark

While it sounds good, I hate the idea of a new kind of RAM that can't be moved to another system, should I decide to later upgrade.

Same reason I disliked RDRAM :/

#3, You could use this ram in an Intel solution, you just wouldn... : Sargent Duck (#4) «

#4, Actually, 'cording to OCZ, you can't use it in other syst... : Kurlon (#8) «

#8, U serious? that's pretty dumb : Sargent Duck (#11) «

#11, yeah, nice catch... if it breaks compatability, the... : wierdo (#12) «

#8, I thought that was due to banks and "sides", not page ... : evermore (#18) «

#18, I imagine it's there to support larger DIMM memory ... : Buub (#19) «

#4, **Not compatible with Intel platforms : Shark (#15) «

#1. Posted at 09:25 AM on May 8th 2007

Edit Reply

Dposcorp

YES! In your face, Intel fan bois!!!!!!!!1111

Whacha gonna say now???

<crickets crickets crickets crickets>

Oops, forgot they all got banned :)

It would be interesting though to see these tested against other ram with the same specs, timings, and voltage.

#1, YES! In your face, Intel fan bois!!!!!!!!1111 I was laughing... : Shinare (#5) «

#5, You have coerced a smile from my frostbitten lips. Thanks... : Retiky (#9) «

#5, Shinare, that made you feel sad for me? Man, have you look... : Dposcorp (#10) «

#10, e=wtf! Einstein would be proud. : derFunkenstein (#13) «

#13, f!=13077775800 I'm not too sure what the w and t ar... : imtheunknown176 (#14) «

#14, I tried calling that number, and reached the Wyo... : neon (#17) «

#1, Dollars to donuts it's within 2% on average and under 10% on... : Peldor (#6) «

#1, Is say "09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0" to ... : maxxcool (#16) «

#7. Posted at 10:34 AM on May 8th 2007

Edit Reply

derFunkenstein

Press releases != news

#2. Posted at 09:34 AM on May 8th 2007, Edited at 09:37 AM on May 8th 2007

Edit Reply

wierdo

Erm...ok did someone test this yet? :P

I'm curious but also skeptical about their claims...

Would like to see how this compares to another typical comparable memory stick with the same latencies. Yes it may not be an accurate comparison, but if these claims are worth anything then something should still be noticeable regardless :P

Comparing it to the DDR2-800 solutions wouldn't hurt either.