![]()
| #8. Posted at 01:16 PM on Jul 9th 2007, Edited at 01:17 PM on Jul 9th 2007 | Edit Reply |
|
swaaye |
Go Intel :) Sure have pounded AMD into the ground.... Look at those prices! It's like the Athlon XP / Duron days all over again, except this time we get dual cores.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Corrado |
Still want it, but I'm having a hard time biting the bullet to replace my Prescott 3.0 since like.... I don't do anything on it.
|
![]()
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Ricardo Dawkins |
ppl, build me a combo with the sub-90.00 AMD chips here.
I need a mobo with AGP and DDR1 + DDR2 support (if possible with IMC) With 2 IDE + SATA and legacy connectors like parallel ports, floppy and the like. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Shinare |
Whats the 6000+ most directly compare to from Intel's offerings. I surely want a C2D in my next upcoming build, but at $178 for the top of the line non-FX chip from AMD seems to me to be rather attractive.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
maroon1 |
#2
Just wait for E6550 or E6750, they are going to be priced $163 and $183 respectively |
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
flip-mode |
FX-7x prices suck. If they got the 72 to $400 a pair they just might move some of those chips. For heaven's sake please, somebody put out a reasonably priced Quad-FX mobo, with some proper voltage regulation so it's not sucking 400+ watts of power.
Why in the world is AMD delaying it's next-gen AM2+ chipset until Barcelona? Put that thing on the market already. I don't understand what advantage there is to holding the thing off. I am so going to become an Intel fanboy with the way things are going. |
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
BoBzeBuilder |
A 4400+ for under $100. Never thought I'd see the day.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
derFunkenstein |
So what goes between $178 and $599? Barcelona is such a far off place...
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Usacomp2k3 |
So basically they don't want to see any FX-72's?
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |