![]()
| #3. Posted at 03:58 PM on Jul 19th 2007 | Edit Reply |
|
heruur |
Good grief...another freaking 8600 card.. Why is NVIDIA flooding the market with a below mainstream card?
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Dposcorp |
Nice review Geoff, but man, this card is $245 shipped at Newegg, and a eVga 320MB 8800GTS is like $286 with a $20 rebate, making it $266.
Why would anyone buy this card instead of the 320MB 8800GTS, which cleans its clock? Check the different scores in this review. http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2975&p=6 I guess my point is, if you are spending $245 on card, spend another 10% and get 30-50% increase in performance. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
flip-mode |
Thanks for the review.
The first round of DX10 cards is a loser. As DX10 benchmarks start trickling out even the mighty 8800GT( ) cards get pummeled. None the less, if you need a card it may as well be a DX10 card. But for anyone with a 7900 series or x1900 series card I'd suggest waiting. I'm going console when I get the chance anyway. I'm done spending $200 a pop on a single video card. Oh, and then another $130 (minimum!!!) on Vista to get full access to all it's features. To wii or to 360, that is the question. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
poulpy |
"NVIDIA'S GEFORCE 8600 GTS has proven so potent that AMD hasn't introduced a mid-range Radeon HD graphics card to compete directly with it"
I thought the 8600s weren't stellar and the AMD ones were just slower, didn't see the 8600 as "so potent".. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
maroon1 |
#19,
It gets owned by what ? Just look at your own benchmark 8600GTS is not a bad performer, it performed better than X1950Pro in STALKER. I would say that it is overall slightly faster than 7900GS but slightly slower than X1950pro. In other words 8600GTS is not a bad video card as many people claim. Not to forget that 8600GTS runs cooler than the older DX9 cards, and it produce better image quality |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Usacomp2k3 |
Just saw a link to a 8600gts for $140 after rebates.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
maroon1 |
#1
The cheapest 8600GTS cost $149 after MIR http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130084 |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
unmake |
What's up with that Gigabyte card? Passively cooled, yet it's louder under load and uses more power?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Tarx |
Although the aim was similar cards, it would be nice to have a couple or so comparative cards included in such a review.
Especially the X1950Pro as it is quite cheap these days, but also the 8800GTS 320MB (to see what paying a bit more will bring) and the 2600XT (more of a 8600GT competitor, but still) |
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Nullvoid |
Far better just to buy the cheapest 8600gts you can ($154.99 for an MSI on newegg) and then slap a Zerotherm GX815 ($31.99) onto it. You should be able to get near enough the same final clock speeds, the card will undoubtedly run cooler and you'd be roughly $50 better off.
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |