37 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #3. Posted at 03:58 PM on Jul 19th 2007 Edit   Reply

Good grief...another freaking 8600 card.. Why is NVIDIA flooding the market with a below mainstream card?
collapse

   #35. Posted at 07:59 PM on Jul 20th 2007, Edited at 08:00 PM on Jul 20th 2007 Edit   Reply

Geez, this review has been up here at the top for a day now. What gives?
collapse

   #10. Posted at 07:33 PM on Jul 19th 2007 Edit   Reply

Nice review Geoff, but man, this card is $245 shipped at Newegg, and a eVga 320MB 8800GTS is like $286 with a $20 rebate, making it $266.

Why would anyone buy this card instead of the 320MB 8800GTS, which cleans its clock?

Check the different scores in this review.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2975&p=6

I guess my point is, if you are spending $245 on card, spend another 10% and get 30-50% increase in performance.
collapse
#20, See post 15.  :   (#22)  «

   #27. Posted at 08:15 AM on Jul 20th 2007 Edit   Reply

Thanks for the review.

The first round of DX10 cards is a loser. As DX10 benchmarks start trickling out even the mighty 8800GT( ) cards get pummeled.

None the less, if you need a card it may as well be a DX10 card. But for anyone with a 7900 series or x1900 series card I'd suggest waiting.

I'm going console when I get the chance anyway. I'm done spending $200 a pop on a single video card. Oh, and then another $130 (minimum!!!) on Vista to get full access to all it's features. To wii or to 360, that is the question.
collapse

   #25. Posted at 04:54 AM on Jul 20th 2007, Edited at 04:55 AM on Jul 20th 2007 Edit   Reply

"NVIDIA'S GEFORCE 8600 GTS has proven so potent that AMD hasn't introduced a mid-range Radeon HD graphics card to compete directly with it"

I thought the 8600s weren't stellar and the AMD ones were just slower, didn't see the 8600 as "so potent"..
collapse

   #24. Posted at 04:04 AM on Jul 20th 2007, Edited at 04:06 AM on Jul 20th 2007 Edit   Reply

#19,

It gets owned by what ?

Just look at your own benchmark

8600GTS is not a bad performer, it performed better than X1950Pro in STALKER.

I would say that it is overall slightly faster than 7900GS but slightly slower than X1950pro. In other words 8600GTS is not a bad video card as many people claim. Not to forget that 8600GTS runs cooler than the older DX9 cards, and it produce better image quality
collapse

   #21. Posted at 11:49 PM on Jul 19th 2007 Edit   Reply

Just saw a link to a 8600gts for $140 after rebates.
collapse

   #5. Posted at 04:57 PM on Jul 19th 2007 Edit   Reply

#1

The cheapest 8600GTS cost $149 after MIR
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130084
collapse

   #11. Posted at 07:39 PM on Jul 19th 2007 Edit   Reply

What's up with that Gigabyte card? Passively cooled, yet it's louder under load and uses more power?
collapse

   #8. Posted at 06:52 PM on Jul 19th 2007, Edited at 06:53 PM on Jul 19th 2007 Edit   Reply

Although the aim was similar cards, it would be nice to have a couple or so comparative cards included in such a review.
Especially the X1950Pro as it is quite cheap these days, but also the 8800GTS 320MB (to see what paying a bit more will bring) and the 2600XT (more of a 8600GT competitor, but still)
collapse

   #2. Posted at 03:47 PM on Jul 19th 2007 Edit   Reply

Holy crap.....73C under load is 'good'?
collapse

   #1. Posted at 03:43 PM on Jul 19th 2007 Edit   Reply

Far better just to buy the cheapest 8600gts you can ($154.99 for an MSI on newegg) and then slap a Zerotherm GX815 ($31.99) onto it. You should be able to get near enough the same final clock speeds, the card will undoubtedly run cooler and you'd be roughly $50 better off.
collapse
37 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q