24 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #24. Posted at 03:41 PM on Sep 6th 2007 Edit   Reply

Hello,
Just letting you know that we added another Q&A Mempile was kind enough to do for us. Many of the questions people asked are answered (at least partly in this one):
http://www.tfot.info/news/41/follow-up-mempile-answers-your-questio...
collapse

   #12. Posted at 05:46 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

Mempile? Mempile?
collapse

   #20. Posted at 03:19 AM on Aug 24th 2007 Edit   Reply

I searched the journals and found the relevant publication. The technique seems to work in the laboratory, but its commercial viability is still questionable. The current bottleneck is in the writing process. In its unwritten form, the disc is always 'on' and the writer burns dark spots within the disc. Due to the nature of the dark patches, they are only noticeable within a few microns of the laser focus. This allows the laser to pass unperturbed through higher layers and to accurately focus on a layer deep within the material. A multilayer DVD on the other hand doesn't work this way. The dark spots on these layers will affect laser as it passes through, distorting the beam and preventing a good focus. This limits you to a few high density layers or many layers where the density drops with each layer. Either way, you can’t scale DVD’s up to TB levels. This is where Mempile’s technique really shines.

Unfortunately, the Mempile technique requires a high peak power laser to ‘burn’ the disc. Rather than using a cheap $5 laser diode, they need a more expensive solid state laser. These lasers cost somewhere between a new car and a small house, so they’re not quite practical yet. Personally, I think laser diodes will improve in power before Mempile will be able to engineer their system to write at conventional diode power levels. Given the several orders of magnitude gap between these levels, I think 1.5 years might be a little optimistic.

====================================================
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics
Vol. 45, No. 2B, 2006, pp. 1229-1234
URL : http://jjap.ipap.jp.proxy.lib.umich.edu/link?JJAP/45/1229/
DOI : 10.1143/JJAP.45.1229
A New Medium for Two-Photon Volumetric Data Recording and Playback

Andrew N. Shipway*, Moshe Greenwald, Nimer Jaber, Ariel M. Litwak and Benjamin J. Reisman Mempile Israel, Ltd., Kiryat Hatikshoret, Neve Ilan, DN Harey Yehuda 90850, Israel

Abstract:

A new optical data storage media has been developed, which allows three-dimensional serial data storage and retrieval by two-photon excitation. The disk is essentially of a monolithic structure, and utilizes a proprietary photochromic organic fluorophore as the data storage element. This new data storage chromophore has very small linear optical differences between its two states, allowing massively multilayer data storage, and has a large Stokes shift of over 100 nm, allowing its use in very high concentrations. The thermodynamic energy barrier for isomerization in the ground state is 90 kJ mol-1, giving adequate thermodynamic stability, and the two forms of the chromophore have large differences in their two-photon-excited fluorescence intensity, allowing data readout by two-photon microscopy.
collapse

   #18. Posted at 09:16 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

That doesn't sound that hot to me. How much time would it take to burn a TB? What about Coasters? that would be fun... spending a whole day burning a bad cd. I'm not sure if optical media is the best solution when you are backing up that much data.
collapse

   #17. Posted at 08:37 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

1.5 years instead of 5 years...a step in the right direction for the typical awesome storage tech that's not released announcement.
collapse

   #16. Posted at 08:12 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

Less talk, more discs =/

I need this yesterday.
collapse

   #6. Posted at 01:45 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

Heck, what happened to the holographic media they were talking about 6 months ago? They were taking like it was the next big thing, I guess it is just another storage format that never will come out.
collapse

   #1. Posted at 12:32 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

Yawn... 'optical drive technology of the future' of the week.
collapse

   #4. Posted at 12:55 PM on Aug 23rd 2007, Edited at 02:58 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

I wondered what happened to the FMCD. I guess someone bought out all the tech from CCCD and now we go from 20 layer 140GB discs to 200 layer 1TB discs.

Constellation 3D was the company that did a proof of concept demo of writing 10GB of data to a 25 cent roll of clear scotch tape. (CCCD was their trade symbol)

[Edit] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescent_Multilayer_Disc
collapse

   #9. Posted at 03:27 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

sounds like it will be cartridge based like magneto optical tech. a little scratch and there go a few layers of readability.
collapse

   #8. Posted at 02:54 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

If this were Slashdot, I'd be tagging this "vapor" right about now. ;)
collapse

   #5. Posted at 01:25 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

What happened to FB-ROMs ? Did I get that right? F-something-ROMs. Maybe it was FMD… anyhow it was an optical disc media after DVD but before HD-DVD and before Blu Ray. Multiple prismatic layers. The laser would be broken up into a different color depending on layer. Sensor read the color and hey presto! mass storage.
collapse

   #3. Posted at 12:38 PM on Aug 23rd 2007 Edit   Reply

From the sound of the technology, density won't be very high, just many layers, so unless it can read/write to mult. layers at a time, this won't be any faster than a DVD's write/read speeds.
collapse
24 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q