11 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #4. Posted at 08:00 PM on Aug 30th 2007 Edit   Reply

It is an irresponsible and corrupt idea anyway. It's like a city deciding to provide taxpayer-funded telephone service or something. The dead hand of government does not belong in a for-profit business. Stealing competitors' money to fund their scheme is also quite unjust.
collapse

   #5. Posted at 12:29 AM on Aug 31st 2007 Edit   Reply

I've been reading arguments that SF County should lay it's own fiber whens it rebuilds the utilities under the streets and skip Wi-Fi.
collapse

   #6. Posted at 05:59 AM on Aug 31st 2007 Edit   Reply

dang it. Explains why when you google this topic all you find are a bunch of press releases from around 2005 and nary a mention of it since.
collapse

   #1. Posted at 01:16 PM on Aug 30th 2007 Edit   Reply

Damned, what ever happened to google's attempt to provide wifi free of charge to everyone in SF?
collapse
11 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q