18 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]

   #7. Posted at 11:20 AM on Sep 10th 2007 Edit   Reply

It's rather interesting to see AMD being able to use 55nm process for their ATI-branded GPUs but not for their AMD-branded CPUs. I'm sure the process rules difference is because the 55nm process is from a third-party foundry, but I wonder if AMD can use it for their CPUs as a stop-gap measure for their low-power segment?
collapse

   #5. Posted at 11:06 AM on Sep 10th 2007 Edit   Reply

If only ATI focused on releasing decent 8800 competitors instead of rehashing their low end trash. After all, nvidia's corresponding are equally useless. It's the other segment of the market where ATI is severely lacking.
collapse

   #1. Posted at 09:57 AM on Sep 10th 2007 Edit   Reply

I wonder what DX 10.1 has to offer over DX 10......
collapse
#1, Nothing.....  :   (#2)  «

   #6. Posted at 11:15 AM on Sep 10th 2007 Edit   Reply

Why not raise the rop and tmu by 4 and turn the clock speed down some? It would be a decent performer if they did.
collapse
18 Comments(s). 1 Pages(s). Showing page 1. [ 1 ]
 
Name/Password: / Remember
Reply to:
[click to clear]

[RED] [GREEN]
[BOLD]
[ITALIC] [STRIKE]
[UNDERLINE]

Notice: All posts should abide by the rules, please.
Note: Ctrl-Enter submits the post. (In IE)
DThread keys: Click on a reply to position the blue bar. 'A'/'Z' move it up/down.
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed)
    r{ red }r     g{ green }g     /[ italic ]/     *[ bold ]*
    _[ underline ]_     -[ strike ]-     s[ sample ]s     o[ spoiler ]o  q[ (QUOTE) ]q