![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ssidbroadcast |
two Quad-Core 45nm Xeons paired with a 2600 XT ? Talk about an unbalanced equation…
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
blastdoor |
These super high end unix workstations are nice, but I wish they would sell a Pro-level *desktop* computer. Even if it's not the "xMac" in a nifty form-factor, just a single socket Mac Pro with regular RAM would be a welcome addition to the product lineup.
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
leor |
2800 isn't even that bad for a workstation of that quality. apple moving to intel was one of the best moves they've ever made. at least their claims of the most powerful computers out there actually measure up now.
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |
- MORE money is made on notebook parts (chipsets, ram, cpu)
- MORE money is made on server parts (chipsets, ram, cpu)
- LESS money is made on desktop parts (chipset, ram, cpu)
Apple's margin's are good BECAUSE they 100% skip desktop parts (chipsets, ram, cpu). Imagine Apple going with some Intel desktop motherboard, Q6600 and 2GB of DDR2 -- THAT kind of system's margin is TINY (look at Dell/HP, etc).
On the other hand, Apple DOES sell a single socketed Xeon (-$500) of the Mac Pro. Still uses FB-DIMM, still is Apple box.