![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Nelliesboo |
winner!
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
d0g_p00p |
I think this will be my upgrade from my EeePC 701. I was looking at the 900, but $549 is way to much IMHO. I think MSI hit the jackpot with this model. I hope they can supply them though without the issues ASUS had.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
cf18 |
I would love to see Techreport perform a full compare/review with EeePC 900, the new HP and this MSI Wind.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
elty |
10" screen, 6 hours of battery life with the standard six-cell battery all for just $399? Sold!
By the way I have used C7 before, and there is nothing wrong with it as long as you are not foolish enough to play any 3D game. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ew |
Q: What do you call it when you sit on your new MSI Wind laptop?
A: Breaking Wind! mwhahahahaha... .... so bored. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Jypster |
My wifes old T23 has finnaly given up the ghost. The way she treated it and being knocked off the table/car bonnet etc to many times to count over the years I can't blame it. So I thought I would look into one of these as the price seams pretty good. Compared to $3.5K for the t23 back in the day could afford to replace it a few times.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Prototyped |
I think this might well be the best of the upcoming crop of UMPCs.
* It has a 2.5" hard disk, so it's either 5400 rpm or can be replaced with a 5400 rpm or 7200 rpm drive. * It has full-sized keys, so it's easier to type on than the Eee and its knockoffs. * It is designed with RAM upgrades in mind. * Bluetooth available in the more expensive model ($150 is quite a lot for XP Home from a volume OEM + internal USB Bluetooth + 512 MiB SO-DIMM, though.) * Uses an Atom processor rather than a much hotter-running Celeron M (no SpeedStep, even) or a slower VIA C7. (Isaiah will be interesting, but that isn't in production yet, and it might run hot.) * Extended battery? (The interviewee mentioned a three-cell battery that I took to mean an extended battery.) * Linux version has a mainstream distro (SuSE) rather than an offbeat one (Xandros with a custom shell). |
![]()
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
etilena |
this competition is good. it will definitely drive prices down for a future purchase at the end of the year. hehehe.
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |
um... from all reports i've heard, VIA's chips perform better than the Atom, but they just suck more power. for a laptop i think i'd go with the C7 or isaiah. Atom's really meant more for PDA or smaller devices, IMO.