![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Furen |
"Despite attempts to thwart solid-state drive makers with lawsuits..."
Not despite, because of. If Seagates lawsuits succeed, the SSD market will not disappear, only other SSD manufacturers. This would mean that it would be in a position to take more market share as one of the few entrenched players still standing. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Jon |
I wonder what the expected lifespan would be of an SSD. There's no mechanical parts, nothing to 'wear' down over time. So will bit-creep become the de-facto reason for SSD failure? Ie, the same problem that afflicts Flashdrives.
There's also the question of how many read/write cycles can the SSD endure before caving in? |
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Spotpuff |
I would buy one for $0.20/GB, let alone $0.10/GB. Hell, even at $0.30/GB you're looking at only $150 for a 500GB SSD which is pretty good.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
ludi |
Bandwagon, meet Seagate. Seagate, this is Bandwagon. Glad to see the two of you finally hitting it off.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Forge |
Yeah, the only disk I would strongly want an SSD for would be my OS disk. That's currently a WD 150GB Raptor that I paid around 100$ for. That's ~0.60$/GB, so even 1$/GB sounds very doable to me. I only need ~150-200GB total. My Linux install is lighter, I was on a 36GB Raptor till very recently.
The big huge multi-hundred GB drives can stay spinning platters for the foreseeable future. It's the OS drives that could use the speed, and they can be much smaller. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
paulWTAMU |
I'd look at it around 2 dollars/gig for myself *shrug*. At that point a 128 gig drive would be affordable as part of a PC. By the time it's a buck/gig I think they could maybe start to make real inroads to desktop storage.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
DrDillyBar |
I'm still waiting for Holographic or something. I've got 5 HDD's at the moment, and would love to get a pair of 2TB drives to run as a mirror.
That being said, Vista's OS partition on a nice zippy SSD would work well. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
bdwilcox |
This only proves that the timing of their lawsuit was pure coincidence. [/sarcasm]
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |
So saying SSD at .50 / gb is good enough to be appealing against today's magnetic storage at .16c / gb is missing the point - winning the contest against 2008 magnetics in 2010 does you no good at all.