![]()
| #2. Posted at 12:03 AM on Jun 20th 2008 | Edit Reply |
|
ssidbroadcast |
GPGPU news is neat, but... it's hard to get excited about it since the applications for it are limited use.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
wingless |
I would like to see OpenCL be like the DirectX of GPGPU computing. In the future we may see GPU benchmarks with both synthetic, game, and gpgpu workload tests comparing AMD, Nvidia, and maybe even Intel GPUs.
I imagine we will see a lot of applications for this new technology in about 2 years. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
DrCR |
I'm really liking the desire of AMD to keep things open. Better for the coders, ultimately better for the end-users.
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Krogoth |
Oh boy, GPGPU is really the new name for something old.
Math co-processor!. Seriously, a GPU is nothing more then a massively paralleled and super-scaled FPU. |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
mako |
AMD needs to revamp its stream computing website. Nvidia has their "CUDA zone" but googling doesn't turn up anything similar for ATI.
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |