![]()
| #6. Posted at 08:19 AM on Jun 27th 2008 | Edit Reply |
|
echo_seven |
Nice to see that they're actually working on this thing...anytime AMD stops talking about something it usually means its not doing so well, or about to be canceled.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
StashTheVampede |
Fusion *has* to be built with scaling in mind. Do NOT go for the highest performance with a single die: focus on good performance with near linear scaling. The latest GPUs are showing that trend, here's hoping Fusion gets built with the similar ideas.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Chaos-Storm |
Atom will probably be more power efficient by itself. But given that the AMD chip will include the chipset, and intel's chipsets are incredibly power hungry compared to the atom cpu, it looks like amd will win based on power consumption. If they can deliver...
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Anonymous Coward |
What can be so hard about sticking graphics onto the same package as a CPU? This product could sell right now...
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
satinspiral |
Sooo...how long before kids begin requesting a UMPC powered by Shrek?
|
![]()
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
CasbahBoy |
Oh, good. I'd be really interested if AMD tosses a few of these onto Mini-ITX boards...also I'm happy to see more DisplayPort support out there, I hope it catches on in a big way in the next year or two.
|
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |