![]()
| #11. Posted at 08:50 AM on Jul 8th 2008 | Edit Reply |
|
flip-mode |
I guess it is always good to have options, but if it's already an mATX board why settle for anything less than an Athlon X2 with some 780G love?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
dermutti |
Why are atom procs all paired with these crappy 945 chipsets? Does intel just have a ridiculous amount of surplus inventory on these or is there some technical reason why they are doing this?
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
MadManOriginal |
945GC and no digital monitor output...pass.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
derFunkenstein |
if you're going to make a microATX board, why wouldn't you give us all the slots? A PCI-e x16 slot for a Radeon 2400 or whatever would cure the issue with the missing DVI port.
|
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Hattig |
Any information about Intel crippling the 64-bit aspect of the Atom, so all systems can only run with 32-bit OSes?
Can't be bothered with Atom whilst they are using the venerable and power consuming 945 chipset. Intel really need to get their head screwed on, provide a decent desktop chipset for Atom that has decent video decode, and low power usage. C'mon, AMD can do it ... |
![]()
| Edit Reply |
|
Xenolith |
This has been posted before, but for review... http://www.mini-box.com/Intel-D945GCLF-Mini-ITX-Motherboard
I bought one of these... part of a Mame project. Works great. Only problem is that the northbridge uses more juice than the processor. |
![]()
|
Jazztags: (they MUST be closed) r{ red }r g{ green }g /[ italic ]/ *[ bold ]* _[ underline ]_ -[ |